Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Intraventricular Drug Delivery and Sampling for Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Study
Published on: March 31, 2022
Real-World Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Intravenous Fosfomycin: The FORTRESS Study
Klaus-Friedrich Bodmann1, Stefan Hagel2, Alessandra Oliva3
1Kliniken Nordoberpfalz AG, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany.
Introduction:
Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic primarily used in combination therapy to treat severe infections caused by both Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) pathogens, including multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. The aim of this study, the largest to date, was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, usage patterns, and patient characteristics of FOS in a real-world setting.
Methods:
Interim analysis of an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in five European countries, involving centres in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Greece, and Austria.
Results:
A total of 716 patients were enrolled between January 2017 and November 2023 (mean age: 62.8 years, APACHE II: 18.3, SOFA: 6.7). Main indications for FOS were bacteraemia/sepsis (23.6%), complicated urinary tract infections (18.0%), and bone and joint infections (17.4%). Other indications included hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia (11.0%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (9.1%), bacterial meningitis/central nervous system (CNS) infections (7.8%), and infective endocarditis (6.4%). Most common pathogens identified were Staphylococcus aureus (31.4%, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus), Klebsiella spp. (including K. pneumoniae) (17.2%), Escherichia coli (14.2%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (12.9%), other Enterobacterales (10.9%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.4%). In 34.6% of patients, an MDR pathogen was involved. Carbapenem resistance (CR) was high in Klebsiella spp. infections (59/123, 48.0%). In most patients, FOS was used in combination therapy (90.2%). The median dose was 15 g/day. Overall, clinical success and clinical response were favourable with 75.3% and 83.4% at the end of FOS treatment. Clinical success rates in infections caused by MDR or CR pathogens were 78.0% and 81.8%, respectively. Microbiological cure was achieved in 82.4% of all patients. Electrolyte imbalances were the most frequently observed adverse drug reactions, while gastrointestinal disorders were rare.
Conclusion:
The results from this study suggest that FOS is a safe and effective option as combination partner in the treatment of patients with severe infections caused by both GP and GN pathogens, including deep-seated infections and/or involvement of MDR bacteria.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02979951.
Insights
Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) effectively treats severe Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections, including those caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria. This large real-world study confirms its safety and efficacy as a combination therapy partner.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used for severe infections.
- It is often employed in combination therapy against Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) pathogens, including multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the real-world effectiveness, safety, usage patterns, and patient characteristics of intravenous FOS.
- This study represents the largest evaluation of FOS to date.
Main Methods:
- Interim analysis of a prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study.
- Data collected from 716 patients across five European countries (Germany, Italy, UK, Greece, Austria) between January 2017 and November 2023.
Main Results:
- Common indications included bacteraemia/sepsis, complicated urinary tract infections, and bone/joint infections.
- Prevalence of MDR pathogens was 34.6%, with high carbapenem resistance (48.0%) in Klebsiella spp. infections.
- FOS demonstrated favorable clinical success (75.3%) and microbiological cure (82.4%), including in MDR/CR infections (78.0%). Electrolyte imbalances were the most common adverse drug reactions.
Conclusions:
- Intravenous fosfomycin is a safe and effective combination therapy agent for severe GP and GN infections.
- It is particularly valuable for deep-seated infections and those involving MDR bacteria.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Routes of Drug Administration: Parenteral
The intravenous route (IV) of drug administration can be further categorized into two types. The bolus injection administers the entire dose rapidly, while an intravenous infusion slowly delivers smaller doses steadily.
The IV route is often...
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...

