Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
Isolation of Proximal Fluids to Investigate the Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Published on: November 5, 2020
An integrated multi-omics biomarker approach using molecular profiling and microRNAs for evaluation of pancreatic
Mohamed H Maher1,2, Warapen Treekitkarnmongkol1, Sayak Ghatak3
1Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background:
Classification and risk stratification of pancreatic cysts are challenging because of limited radiographic and cytomorphologic features. Although molecular profiling has emerged as an ancillary test for pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF), additional high-sensitivity and -specificity biomarkers are still needed for improved classification.
Methods:
In this study, PCF from 93 patients, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (n = 65), mucinous cystic neoplasms (n = 9), serous cystadenomas (n = 9), pancreatic cyst not otherwise specified (n = 8), and pseudocysts (n = 2), were evaluated for biomarkers. Molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing was performed, and a subset of the cases (n = 32) were interrogated with 2083 microRNAs (miRNAs) to evaluate their use for pancreatic cyst risk stratification.
Results:
As independent PCF biomarkers in 32 cases with histologic diagnoses, three miRNAs performed significantly better than mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in discriminating high-risk from low-risk cysts. The three elevated miRNAs in combination with mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, and serum CA19-9 displayed similar diagnostic performance (miR-4461: area under the curve [AUC], 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.800-1; miR-6723-5p: AUC, 0.958; 95% CI, 0.850-1; miR-6755-3p: AUC, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.816-1) in discriminating high-risk from low-risk cysts, when compared to mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, CEA, and serum CA19-9 (AUC, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.825-1). In the absence of CA19-9, the three-marker panel of KRAS, GNAS, and miRNAs showed marginally improved performance compared with KRAS, GNAS, and CEA, which highlights the potential utility of miRNAs as biomarkers in PCF analysis.
Conclusions:
These findings demonstrate that a multiomics biomarker approach with elevated PCF miRNAs with mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, and serum CA19-9 may help in better detecting high-risk cysts for early clinical intervention.
