Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Technologies and Challenges in Elemental Analysis of Food Samples
Published on: December 22, 2023
A Contemporary Look at the Precision of Modern Analytical Methods in Food Analysis and the Relevance of the Horwitz
Stefan Ehling1, Joseph J Thompson2, Karen J Schimpf1
1Abbott Nutrition, Global Analytical & Food Safety, 3300 Stelzer Rd., Columbus, OH 43219, United States.
Background:
The Horwitz equation models an empirically observed relationship between inter-laboratory relative standard deviation RSDR and analyte concentration expressed as a mass fraction. The Horwitz ratio (HorRat) is the ratio of observed RSDR to the corresponding calculated RSDR from the Horwitz equation. The empirical acceptable range is 0.5 to 2.0 for a successful multi-laboratory method validation trial.
Objective:
This work examines data from multi-laboratory trials on food analyses conducted between 2011 and 2017 for trends in analytical method precision and the applicability and relevance of the Horwitz model.
Methods:
Data on method precision from 20 multi-laboratory trials consisting of 961 data points were analyzed. The scope was limited to methods employing modern chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques and to well-defined small-molecule analytes and elements. Within-laboratory and inter-laboratory precision and their ratio, HorRat, goodness of fit to the Horwitz model, and variation of precision across the analytical range were examined.
Results:
The variance of inter-laboratory precision is largely (86%) independent of concentration and remains unexplained by the Horwitz equation. Only 52% of all data points fell within the Horwitz band (0.5-2.0), with 46% falling under 0.5, indicating substantially better inter-laboratory precision than predicted by the Horwitz equation at all concentration levels. Near-constant precision was confirmed across the analytical range of methods, even near the limit of quantitation.
Conclusion:
The analysis of the data in scope demonstrates that the analytical method precision routinely achievable with modern chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques, proper laboratory controls, and training is much better than that predicted by the Horwitz equation. HorRat has lost its relevance as a method performance criterion for judging the success of a multi-laboratory trial.
Highlights:
Recent data do not follow the Horwitz model. HorRat values <0.5 can be routinely achieved. Method precision is mostly independent of analyte concentration. Method-related factors have greater impact on precision.
More Related Videos
08:43PTR-ToF-MS Coupled with an Automated Sampling System and Tailored Data Analysis for Food Studies: Bioprocess Monitoring, Screening and Nose-space Analysis
Published on: May 11, 2017
08:56Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: November 22, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Development of Analytical Methods
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
The Small x Assumption
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...