Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Language and Cognition

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology l

Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology l

Pathophysiology investigates how biological mechanisms—typically starting at the cellular level—disrupt normal bodily functions. It bridges anatomy and physiology to explain the progression of disease. With this foundation, it is important to understand the following key terms used to describe disease processes: Diagnosis:The process of identifying a disease using clinical evaluation, including signs (objective evidence like rashes), symptoms (subjective experiences like pain), laboratory test...

Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology ll

Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology ll

This lesson explores key terms that describe how diseases progress, their outcomes, and their distribution in populations.Diagnostic tests identify diseases and monitor treatment. These include blood and urine tests, biopsies, imaging (X-ray, MRI), and detection of infectious agents.Remission is a reduction or disappearance of symptoms.Exacerbation refers to the worsening of symptoms, such as increased wheezing during an asthma attack.A precipitating factor triggers an acute episode, while a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Single-cell lineage tracing identifies hemogenic endothelial cells in the adult mouse bone marrow.

eLife·2026

Same author

Acute pancreatitis following sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: A case report.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2026

Same author

A multifunctional ICAM1-directed MnO₂@ZIF8 nanoplatform with Tanshinone IIA synergistically reverses senescence and restores alveolar regeneration in septic lung injury.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026

Same author

Targeting the epigenome and the integrated stress response to normalize colorectal cancer subclonal plasticity and progression.

Cell death & disease·2026

Same author

Evaluation of the effectiveness of local anesthesia approaches for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in dental medicine·2026

Same author

Lithium intoxication complicated by severe bradycardia after single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case report and literature review.

Frontiers in surgery·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Cross sectional pilot study on clinical review generation using large language models.

Zining Luo^1,2,3,4,5, Yang Qiao⁶, Xinyu Xu⁵

¹Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.

NPJ Digital Medicine

|March 20, 2025

Summary

Large language models (LLMs) can generate clinical reviews rapidly but lack depth and accuracy compared to human authors. Current AI detection methods are insufficient, highlighting the need for enhanced systems and ethical guidelines for responsible AI integration in medical research.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Area of Science:

Medical Informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Evidence Synthesis

Background:

The rapid growth of medical literature necessitates efficient evidence synthesis tools.
Large language models (LLMs) show promise for generating clinical reviews.
Concerns exist regarding the reliability and accuracy of LLM-generated medical content.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically compare LLM-generated clinical reviews with human-authored reviews.
To evaluate the quality, accuracy, and referencing of AI-generated medical literature summaries.
To assess the efficacy of current AI detection systems in the context of clinical reviews.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of clinical reviews generated by LLMs and human experts.
Evaluation metrics included comprehensiveness, logical consistency, citation accuracy, and reference quality.
Assessment of existing AI-generated content detection tools.

Main Results:

LLM-generated reviews were produced faster but contained fewer references and less comprehensive insights.
AI-generated content exhibited lower logical consistency, authenticity, and citation accuracy.
A significant proportion of LLM references were from lower-tier journals.
Current AI detection systems demonstrated inefficiency in identifying AI-generated clinical reviews.

Conclusions:

While LLMs offer speed in generating reviews, they currently fall short in quality and reliability compared to human authors.
There is a critical need for improved AI detection mechanisms and robust ethical frameworks.
Responsible integration of LLMs in clinical research requires addressing challenges in accuracy, transparency, and validation.