Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP02:36

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP

10.9K
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, or ChIP, is an antibody-based technique used to identify sites on DNA that bind to transcription factors of interest or histone proteins. It also helps determine the type of histone modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, or methylation.
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
10.9K
Euchromatin01:01

Euchromatin

6.8K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions take up more dye, appearing darker, while the less-compact areas take up less dye and appear lighter. Based on the compaction level, chromatins are classified into two primary forms – euchromatin and heterochromatin.
Euchromatin is the less dense region of the chromatin and stains lighter. Euchromatin contains histone H3 extensively...
6.8K
Heterochromatin02:38

Heterochromatin

9.3K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions that take up more dye are called heterochromatin. Heterochromatin is further classified into two forms – constitutive heterochromatin and facultative heterochromatin.
Constitutive heterochromatin: It is a highly compact region of chromatin that is mostly concentrated in the centromere and telomere. Unlike euchromatin, the amino acid at...
9.3K
Chromatin Packaging01:32

Chromatin Packaging

16.5K
Each human somatic cell contains 6 billion base pairs of DNA. Each base pair is 0.34 nm long, meaning each diploid cell contains a staggering 2 meters of DNA. This long DNA strand is packed inside a nucleus measuring only 10-20 microns in diameter with the help of specialized DNA-binding proteins called histones. Together they form a compact DNA-protein complex called chromatin. The chromatin is further compacted into higher-order structures. The highest level of compaction is achieved during...
16.5K
Duplication of Chromatin Structure02:05

Duplication of Chromatin Structure

5.3K
The process of chromosome duplication during cell division requires genome-wide disruption and re-assembly of chromatin. The chromatin structure must be accurately inherited, reassembled, and maintained in the daughter cells to ensure lineage propagation.
The basic unit of the chromatin is the nucleosome, consisting of DNA wrapped around octameric histone proteins and short stretches of linker DNA separating individual nucleosomes. The histone proteins within the nucleosome have their...
5.3K
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression02:35

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

23.2K
Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences  access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area. 
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
23.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative detection of gut microbial eukaryotes with EukDetect2 reveals global distribution of commensal protists and association with distinct microbial community structure.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Expanding vaginal microbiome pangenomes via a custom MIDAS database reveals <i>Lactobacillus crispatus</i> accessory genes associated with cervical dysplasia.

mSystems·2026
Same author

Linkage of nucleotide and functional diversity varies across gut bacteria.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Leveraging human genetic variation to therapeutically target hundreds of genes with dominant & dispensable disease alleles.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Structural variants in human congenital heart disease disrupt distal genomic regulatory contacts of developmental genes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

An integrated view of the structure and function of the human 4D nucleome.

Nature·2025
Same journal

Efficient evidence-based genome annotation with EviAnn.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

ClairS: a deep-learning method for long-read tumor-normal pair somatic small variant calling.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Cloud-based microscope enables live neuroimaging for 24 h and beyond with worldwide access.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2025

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales
10:15

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.3K

Comparing chromatin contact maps at scale: methods and insights.

Ketrin Gjoni1,2, Laura M Gunsalus1,2, Shuzhen Kuang1,2

  • 1Gladstone Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Nature Methods
|March 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing 3D genome organization requires robust methods for analyzing chromatin contact maps. This study evaluates 25 comparison techniques, recommending biologically informed approaches for accurate insights into genome structure and function.

More Related Videos

Hi-C: A Method to Study the Three-dimensional Architecture of Genomes.
22:27

Hi-C: A Method to Study the Three-dimensional Architecture of Genomes.

Published on: May 6, 2010

408.7K
Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C
09:32

Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C

Published on: October 14, 2022

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2025

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales
10:15

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.3K
Hi-C: A Method to Study the Three-dimensional Architecture of Genomes.
22:27

Hi-C: A Method to Study the Three-dimensional Architecture of Genomes.

Published on: May 6, 2010

408.7K
Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C
09:32

Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C

Published on: October 14, 2022

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Comparing three-dimensional (3D) genome organization is crucial for understanding development, evolution, and disease.
  • Existing methods for comparing chromatin contact maps often yield conflicting results, lacking a standardized approach.
  • A gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of these comparisons is currently absent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate 25 distinct methods for comparing chromatin contact maps.
  • To assess the robustness of these methods against biological and technical variations.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate comparison techniques for 3D genome organization studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Micro-C and Hi-C datasets from two cell types.
  • Incorporated in silico-generated contact maps for controlled comparisons.
  • Assessed method performance based on sensitivity to CTCF-binding site changes, contact intensity variations, and noise.

Main Results:

  • Global comparison methods (e.g., mean squared error) are effective for initial assessments.
  • Biologically informed methods are essential for detailed divergence analysis and hypothesis generation.
  • Identified specific strengths and weaknesses of various comparison techniques.

Conclusions:

  • No single method is universally superior for comparing chromatin contact maps.
  • The choice of comparison method should be guided by the specific biological question.
  • A provided reference guide and codebase facilitate scalable and insightful 3D genome organization analysis.