Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple small brain metastases using gamma knife versus single-isocenter VMAT: Normal
Abram Abdou1, Timoteo Almeida1, Elizabeth Bossart1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Purpose:
The study evaluates rapid linear accelerator (Linac) single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with Hyperarc for large target numbers. We compared to Gamma Knife (GK), which suffers from long treatment times and investigated causes of differences.
Methods:
Linac SRS and GK treatment plans for patients receiving 18 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) were evaluated for mean brain dose and volume of brain receiving 12 Gy or more (V12 Gy) as toxicity correlates. Further investigations included patient-based and simulations of 1-33 brain metastases to compare the ability of Linac SRS and GK to separate adjacent and distant lesions.
Results:
For three patients (33, 33, and 18 metastases), GK reduced mean brain dose (2.89 Gy, 2.38 Gy, 2.79 Gy) compared to 2.5 mm microMLCs (4.36 Gy, 4.75 Gy, 4.26 Gy, p = 0.027) and 5 mm MLCs (4.71 Gy, 5.22 Gy, 4.60 Gy, p = 0.024). GK also improved V12 Gy (13.29 cc, 11.62 cc, 33.79 cc) compared to microMLC (25.31 cc, 30.91 cc, 54.71 cc, p = 0.019) and MLC (31.69 cc, 33.68 cc, 54.71 cc). This must be balanced with GK treatment times (5-11 h). GK achieved 50% prescription line separation at smaller distances (1.8-7.6 mm) than microMLC (7.7-10.2 mm) or MLC (8.8-12.2 mm) for 0.5-1.0 cm targets (4-8 mm collimator single shot). For 1.5 cm targets (16 mm shot) results were mixed (GK 5.4-17 mm, microMLC 9.5-11.2 mm, MLC 9.5-11.3 mm). A 7.7 cm simulation cube was then incrementally filled with 0.5 cm or 1.0 cm equidistant targets. GK plan mean brain dose increased 0.04 Gy/target (1.08 Gy mean/27 targets) compared to 0.14 Gy/target for microMLC (3.78 Gy mean/27 targets) for 0.5 cm targets, with differences diminishing for 1.0 cm targets (GK 0.15 Gy/target, microMLC 0.17 Gy/target).
Conclusions:
For numerous small metastases GK improves dosimetry but has exceedingly long treatment times. GK improves dose separation for adjacent lesions < 1.0 cm and conformity for small (∼0.5 cm) targets. GK and Linac differences are small for individual targets but compound over many targets. V12 Gy limits in the NCIC CE.7 trial protocol mandate dose modifications for Linac SRS but not GK.
