Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Zebrafish Animal Model for the Study of Allergic Reactions in Response to Tick Saliva Biomolecules
Published on: September 16, 2022
Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans
Tamara van Gorkom1,2, Michiel Heron1, Agnetha Hofhuis2
1Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is an emerging tick-borne disease characterised by the development of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) antibodies against galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), a carbohydrate found in most mammalian species, but not in humans. AGS occurs in individuals with a history of tick bites. Currently, no data exist on α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, including those with tick bites or erythema migrans (EM). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, to assess α-gal sIgE seroconversion after tick bites, and to determine the relationship between EM and α-gal sIgE in serum. α-Gal sensitisation rates were assessed in individuals with tick bites (TB), EM, and the general population. Blood samples were collected from TB- and EM-cases at baseline and again after 3 months. Single blood samples from controls were selected from a Dutch population survey. In total, 156 TB-cases, 160 EM-cases, and 316 population controls were included. α-Gal sensitisation rates were 1.9% for population controls and 10.3% and 19.1% for TB- and EM-cases at baseline, respectively (cut-off α-gal sIgE: ≥ 0.10 kUA/L). Rates increased to 17.9% for TB-cases, comparable to the 16.9% for EM-cases 3 months after EM-development. Distinct α-gal sensitisation rates were observed between TB- and EM-cases over a 3-month period. TB-cases showed a rising rate, while EM-cases had elevated rates at both time points. This difference is likely due to timing of the tick bite, with TB-cases having a recent bite and EM-cases developing EM days to weeks post-bite. Both groups had higher sensitisation rates than population controls, corroborating the link between tick bites and α-gal sensitisation.

