Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

619
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
619
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.0K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

493
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
493
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.0K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.6K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

449
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
449

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Network Clustering Approach Reveals Key Proteins and Biological Functions in the Response of Whiteleg Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) to Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease.

Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Graph latent diffusion-based molecular representation learning for enhanced generalization in molecular property prediction.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same author

Self-supervised domain adaptation of protein language model based solely on positive enzyme-reaction pairs.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025
Same author

Relationship between Antiviral Activity against Influenza A Virus Induced by Compound Combinations and Changes in the Physical Properties of Lipid Bilayers.

ACS pharmacology & translational science·2025
Same author

Implementation of a Conditional Latent Diffusion-Based Generative Model to Synthetically Create Unlabeled Histopathological Images.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Field dynamics of the root endosphere microbiome assembly in paddy rice cultivated under no fertilizer input.

Plant & cell physiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2025

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.3K

Quantifying uncertainty in microbiome-based prediction using Gaussian processes with microbial community

Asahi Adachi1, Fan Zhang1, Shigehiko Kanaya1,2

  • 1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma 630-0192, Japan.

Bioinformatics Advances
|March 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a novel Gaussian process (GP) model to quantify uncertainty in human microbiome predictions. This probabilistic approach enhances the reliability of microbiome-based health and disease predictions in clinical settings.

More Related Videos

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

27.7K
Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:19

Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: September 13, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2025

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.3K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

27.7K
Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:19

Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: September 13, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiome research
  • Machine learning applications
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • The human microbiome is intrinsically linked to host health and disease.
  • Machine learning models are increasingly used to predict health status from microbiome data.
  • Quantifying prediction uncertainty is crucial for clinical applications but remains underdeveloped.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a probabilistic prediction model for the human microbiome.
  • To incorporate microbial community dissimilarities into prediction models.
  • To evaluate the model's performance in quantifying predictive uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Gaussian process (GP) model with a kernel function for microbial community dissimilarities.
  • Applied the model to regression tasks including chronological age, body mass index, and disease severity.
  • Utilized publicly available human gut microbiome datasets for evaluation.

Main Results:

  • The developed GP model demonstrated superior probabilistic prediction accuracy compared to existing methods.
  • Confidence levels from the model showed strong correlation with empirical coverage.
  • Predictions with lower uncertainty corresponded to reduced prediction errors.

Conclusions:

  • Gaussian process regression models incorporating community dissimilarities effectively handle phylogenetic, high-dimensional, and sparse microbiome data.
  • The study provides a more reliable framework for microbiome-based predictions.
  • This advancement has the potential to improve health monitoring and disease diagnosis using microbiome data.