Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Recognition of Epidermal Transglutaminase by IgA and Tissue Transglutaminase 2 Antibodies in a Rare Case of Rhesus Dermatitis
Published on: December 15, 2011
Antiphospholipid IgG Certified Reference Material ERM®-DA477/IFCC: a tool for aPL harmonization?
Claudia Grossi1, Liesbet Deprez2, Caterina Bodio1
1Immunorheumatology Research Laboratory, 9354 IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano , Cusano Milanino, Italy.
Objectives:
The Certified Reference Material (CRM) ERM®-DA477/IFCC is a new polyclonal IgG anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) material for the harmonization of the laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We evaluated CRM's ability to represent the heterogeneity of APS patient anti-β2GPI antibodies and to calibrate IgG anti-β2GPI methods.
Methods:
We characterized CRM for its reactivity against domain-1, using the QUANTA Flash® β2GPI-domain-1 assay, and against domains-4-5 of β2GPI, and single-domain-deleted β2GPI molecules using in-house ELISAs. We used QUANTA Lite® ELISA, QUANTA Flash® CLIA, and EliA™ FEIA methods to evaluate the CRM's anti-Cardiolipin (anti-CL) activity. Four anti-β2GPI IgG methods (in-house and QUANTA Lite® ELISA, QUANTA Flash® CLIA, and EliA™ FEIA) were also used to evaluate the CRM's calibration efficacy, alongside 133 clinical samples (CSs) and 99 controls.
Results:
The CRM showed high anti-domain-1 activity and no anti-domain-4-5 activity at the recommended assay dilution. The domain-dependent-β2GPI reactivity profiles were comparable with full-blown APS. There was acceptable dilution linearity for anti-CL assays with R2 ranging from 0.957 to 0.997. For the four anti-β2GPI IgG assays, calibration with the CRM led to a good comparability of the average result of CSs for two of the assays. New cut-offs calculated from this work improved comparability in quantitative results between three of the assays: 85 % concordance with CRM compared to 66 % concordance with assay-specific-calibration.
Conclusions:
The CRM is representative of patient anti-β2GPI/CL heterogeneity and should improve anti-β2GPI IgG method harmonization. However, the level of achievable method harmonization is affected by differences in the selectivity among the assays.

