Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

A Murine Model of Irreversible and Reversible Unilateral Ureteric Obstruction
Published on: December 20, 2014
Percutaneous management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries using a multistep approach: clinical, functional and
Emanuele Barabino1, Arianna Nivolli2, Michele Tosques2
1Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. emanuele.barabino@gmail.com.
Purpose:
Iatrogenic ureteral injuries, while uncommon, are increasingly recognized as a significant source of morbidity and mortality following surgical or medical procedures. The aim of our study is to present a multi-step anterograde approach to treating these injuries, discuss the outcomes, and attempt to classify the injuries based on the mechanisms that caused them.
Materials And Methods:
In this monocentric retrospective study, we evaluated patients who were treated for an IUI using a multistep, anterograde approach involving percutaneous nephrostomy, nephro-ureteral stenting, and anterograde stenting. Injuries were categorized as leakage, occlusive or mixed. Clinical success, drainage dependency, time-to-recanalization, ureteral recanalization rate, ureteral patency and kidney function post-intervention were evaluated as outcome measures.
Results:
The study included 38 patients who underwent 44 procedures, with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. The clinical success rate was 89.5%. The ureteral recanalization rate was 72.7% and, after 6 months, 16 lesions (66.7%) were stent-free. The outcome was significantly better in lesions recanalized within 5 days (p < 0.0001, OR 45.5). Leakage injuries had a higher chance of being recanalized (p = 0.0067, OR 0.1) and better kidney function (p = 0.009, OR 35.3) compared to non-leakage ones. A time to diagnosis < 5 days was associated with preserved kidney function (p = 0.0031, OR = 0.025).
Conclusion:
Iatrogenic injuries can be effectively managed with a percutaneous anterograde approach, yielding favorable long-term outcomes. The type of injury and the time to diagnosis are critical factors that influence clinical results.

