Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Segmentation and Measurement of Fat Volumes in Murine Obesity Models Using X-ray Computed Tomography
Published on: April 4, 2012
Enhancing Nutrition and Obesity Research Collaborations across Institutions: Lessons from a North Carolina Focus
Shelly A Maras1, Dana Carthron2, Ashley Irwin3
1Department of Social Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Background:
There is a need to support underrepresented groups (URGs) of investigators, especially early-stage investigators, in the fields of nutrition and obesity in which substantial health inequities exist among URGs. There is also a critical need to promote diverse collaborations among researchers in the field to increase heterogeneity and scientific rigor. Collaborations between Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs) provide opportunities for career development among investigators from URGs in biomedical research; however, little is known about the barriers and facilitators to successful collaborations.
Objectives:
This study aims to understand the experiences of URG researchers involved in collaborations between HBCUs and PWIs to identify barriers and facilitators of success.
Methods:
We conducted a virtual focus group (n = 12) over Zoom, which comprised administrative staff and faculty members from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a research-intensive PWI, and North Carolina Central University, a regionally adjacent HBCU. A professional facilitator led participants through a discussion where they were asked about their experiences in past collaborations between HBCUs and PWIs. Using inductive coding, our team developed a codebook from the focus group transcript, and we analyzed the data using a quasi-grounded theory approach.
Results:
Analysis of the focus group revealed 3 themes: 1) inequity of the collaborative process, 2) misalignment of capacity and expectations, and 3) stereotypes held by researchers at PWIs. These themes highlight barriers that have prevented mutually beneficial collaborations from forming among the focus group participants.
Conclusions:
To promote mutually beneficial research collaborations between PWIs and HBCUs and, ultimately, to promote diversity among investigators in nutrition and obesity research, awareness must be drawn to the barriers to success in these relationships. It is imperative that institutions have conversations surrounding resources, research capacity, and expectations upon entering such research collaborations.
More Related Videos
09:10Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents
Published on: November 1, 2019
06:28A Chronic High-Intensity Interval Training and Diet-Induced Obesity Model to Maximize Exercise Effort and Induce Physiologic Changes in Rats
Published on: April 28, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Dietary Connections
Regulation of Food Intake
Obesity
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...