Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variations in measured computed tomography number values.

K Faulkner, B M Moores

    Radiography
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Public health promotion: the role of the dermatologist.

    The British journal of dermatology·2015
    Same author

    Establishment of a comprehensive set of regional DRLs for CT by means of electronic X-ray examination records.

    Radiation protection dosimetry·2015
    Same author

    Establishing local and regional DRLs by means of electronic radiographical X-ray examination records.

    Radiation protection dosimetry·2013
    Same author

    Criteria and suspension levels in diagnostic radiology.

    Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
    Same author

    The revision of RP 91 on criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations.

    Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
    Same author

    Development of acceptability criteria in mammography.

    Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
    Same journal

    A constant-area diaphragm.

    Radiography·2010
    Same journal

    Tetratome attachment for layer radiography (tomography, etc.).

    Radiography·2010
    Same journal

    Radiography in a faciomaxillary unit.

    Radiography·2010
    Same journal

    Time and milliamperes.

    Radiography·2010
    Same journal

    The evolution of radiography.

    Radiography·2010
    Same journal

    Stereoradiographic viewing by intersection of the optical axes.

    Radiography·2010
    See all related articles

    Computed Tomography (CT) scan variations were observed across different scanners and phantom setups. Careful interpretation of CT numbers is crucial for accurate tissue differentiation in medical imaging.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Physics

    Background:

    • Computed Tomography (CT) scans are widely used for medical diagnosis.
    • Variations in CT scanner performance can affect image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
    • Understanding factors influencing CT numbers is essential for reliable interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate variations in measured CT numbers on different scanners.
    • To assess the impact of phantom design and scanner parameters on CT values.
    • To evaluate the influence of calibration and reconstruction settings on CT number accuracy.

    Main Methods:

    • Performed CT scans on a water phantom using multiple CT scanners.
    • Utilized a phantom with a Teflon annulus to simulate head scanning conditions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined the effects of scanner position, mAS, beam width, calibration, reconstruction matrix, and compensation filters on CT numbers.

    • Main Results:

    • Observed significant variations in mean pixel values and CT numbers across different CT scanners.
    • Noted positional variations in mean CT numbers, with a headrest causing a notable effect.
    • The Teflon annulus phantom demonstrated an impact on both mean and standard deviation of central pixels.
    • Identified dependencies of CT numbers on mAS, beam width, calibration, reconstruction matrix, and compensation filters.

    Conclusions:

    • CT number values can vary significantly due to scanner type, phantom materials, and acquisition parameters.
    • Caution is advised when interpreting absolute CT number values for tissue differentiation.
    • Accurate CT number interpretation is critical for reliable diagnostic and therapeutic applications in radiology.