Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Performance-based financing in Rwanda: a qualitative analysis of healthcare provider perspectives
Costase Ndayishimiye1,2, Richard Nduwayezu3, Christoph Sowada4
1Health Economics and Social Security Department, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Skawinska 8, Kraków, 31-531, Poland. costase.ndayishimiye@doctoral.uj.edu.pl.
Abstract:
Results-based healthcare financing policies have been adopted in countries worldwide, including those with limited resources. We conducted a retrospective, semistructured interview study to evaluate healthcare providers' experiences with Rwanda's performance-based financing (PBF) policy and the factors influencing its implementation. Guided by the health policy evaluation model-context, content, process, and actors-as a deductive framework supplemented by inductive coding, we analysed data from 21 participants (doctors, n = 13; nurses, n = 5; midwives, n = 3). Providers described PBF as a key motivator, supplementing incomes, increasing accountability, and fostering teamwork to meet performance targets. PBF was credited with improving patient outcomes, particularly in incentivized services; however, concerns arose regarding disparities in service prioritization. Key facilitators of and barriers to the implementation of PBF were identified, providing insights into its operational dynamics. Strong political commitment and integration into national strategies, such as Imihigo, along with decentralization through district steering committees, were key contextual enablers, enhancing the program's flexibility and alignment with local priorities. The content factors centred on a two-tiered contracting system, combining national accreditation processes with individual performance incentives. Process factors supporting PBF were characterized by decentralized evaluations, audits, and multilevel communication, which collectively bolstered accountability mechanisms. The engagement and capacity of stakeholders were highlighted as crucial to the success of PBF. Nonetheless, significant barriers, such as payment delays, manual documentation, untimely evaluations, insufficient training, limited provider participation in decision-making, and the exclusion of patients as stakeholders, were identified. These findings offer practical recommendations for policymakers aiming to improve or adapt provider payment mechanisms in similar contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...

