A Neutral Risk Framework for Active Participation Across the Lifespan: A Call to Action for Using Risk in Movement...

Area of Science:

• Movement science
• Risk management
• Human development

Background:

• Traditional risk management prioritizes preventing negative physical outcomes, like injuries.
• This approach is inadequate for movement contexts (sport, leisure, education) where risk engagement fosters development.
• Existing frameworks fail to encompass the full spectrum of potential outcomes and stakeholder perspectives.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a neutral definition of risk.
• To introduce a comprehensive framework for decision-making in movement contexts.
• To support adequate safety practices for human flourishing.

Main Methods:

• Utilizing the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) definition of risk.
• Developing a framework considering probability of all outcomes (positive, neutral, negative).
• Incorporating multiple timepoints (immediate to multi-generational) and levels (participant to societal).
• Including physical and psychosocial outcome streams.
• Emphasizing stakeholder inclusivity and diverse identities.

Main Results:

• A proposed framework for rational risk decision-making in movement contexts.
• Consideration of a wide range of potential outcomes and perspectives.
• Integration of physical and psychosocial factors.
• Inclusion of diverse stakeholders in risk assessment.

Conclusions:

• A neutral definition of risk and a comprehensive framework are essential for movement contexts.
• This approach supports adequate safety and promotes human flourishing.
• Stakeholder involvement is crucial for developing relevant and effective safety practices.