Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Quadratic-Linear Correlations Between Cephalometric Measurements and Profile
Visessan Pornsirianand1, Janeta Chavanavesh1, Pimsiri Kanpittaya1
1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Introduction And Aims:
Modern orthodontics prioritises the soft tissue paradigm as the main treatment goal. This study used quadratic and/or linear regression to identify cephalometric variables related to profile attractiveness, expanding on previous bivariate analyses.
Methods:
This retrospective cross-sectional study comprised 180 post-treatment lateral cephalograms of 18 to 37 year-old orthodontic patients, equally distributed among 3 profile types (concave, straight, and convex), each comprising 60 cases with balanced sex representation. Profile silhouette attractiveness score (dependent variable) was rated by 30 orthodontists and 30 laypeople using a 5-point Likert scale. Cephalometric parameters (105 independent variables) were analyzed using Dolphin and ImageJ software. Factor analysis identified closely related variables, and 41 selected cephalometric variables were used in correlation and multiple regression analyses to explore their relationships with attractiveness scores separately for orthodontists and laypeople using the R programming language.
Results:
Quadratic correlations were stronger than linear in both groups' perspectives. For laypeople, throat length (linear), facial contour angle, interlip angle, mentolabial angle, and lip-chin-throat angle (quadratic) significantly correlated with attractiveness scores. For orthodontists, nasolabial angle and throat length (linear), upper lip position to facial plane, mentolabial angle, and lip-chin-throat angle (quadratic) significantly correlated with attractiveness scores. Combined quadratic-linear regression models yielded adjusted R2 = 0.5628 for laypeople and adjusted R2 = 0.5241 for orthodontists.
Conclusion:
Soft tissue cephalometric variables, including throat length, mentolabial angle, and lip-chin-throat angle, should be the key treatment goals for esthetic facial profiles. Facial contour and interlip angles are also important to laypeople.
Clinical Relevance:
Orthodontists should focus on modifying the soft tissue cephalometric variables of the lower face area to improve the patient esthetics.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
