Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.3K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.5K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.5K
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

107
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
107
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

Collective intelligence in clinical medicine: what works, what fails, and how collaboration with AI really helps.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same author

The Temporal Dynamics of Attentional Allocation during Counterfactual Learning.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Corporations and financial institutions driving coastal conflicts involving Indigenous Peoples.

Ambio·2026
Same author

Dissociation of the sources of the risk-seeking bias in sensorimotor decision-making based on the subjective-objective relationship in risk attitudes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Relationship among motives for alcohol and caffeine consumption, personality traits, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in nonproblem alcohol drinkers.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.8K

Human cooperation with artificial agents varies across countries.

Jurgis Karpus1, Risako Shirai2,3, Julia Tovar Verba4

  • 1Faculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Studies, LMU, Munich, Germany. jurgis.karpus@lmu.de.

Scientific Reports
|March 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary

People in Japan cooperate equally with AI and humans, unlike in the US where AI exploitation is common. Cultural differences impact human-AI interaction and trust in artificial agents.

Keywords:
Algorithm exploitationCooperationCross-cultural comparisonHuman–AI interaction

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.8K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence Ethics
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Cooperative artificial agents are increasingly prevalent.
  • Exploitation of AI for selfish gain is observed in Western societies.
  • Cultural factors may influence human-AI interaction dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cultural differences in cooperation with artificial agents versus humans.
  • To compare Japanese and US participants' willingness to exploit AI and humans.
  • To understand the emotional responses associated with exploiting AI and human partners.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two classic economic games to assess cooperation.
  • Compared cooperation levels between artificial agents and human partners.
  • Analyzed participants' emotional responses to exploiting partners across cultures.

Main Results:

  • US participants cooperated less with AI than humans.
  • Japanese participants showed equivalent cooperation with AI and humans.
  • Japanese participants expressed negative emotions towards exploiting both AI and humans, unlike US participants.

Conclusions:

  • Cultural context significantly shapes human-AI interaction and trust.
  • AI design must consider diverse societal norms and emotional responses.
  • Findings highlight the need for culturally sensitive AI development and deployment.