Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

The Goeckerman Regimen for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Published on: July 11, 2013
Treating Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP): Timing and Rationale for Biologic Treatment Switching-A Japanese
Yayoi Tada1, Shinichi Imafuku2, Kazumitsu Sugiura3
1Department of Dermatology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. ytada-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Introduction:
Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, inflammatory disease characterized by the sudden and recurrent development of widespread sterile pustules on the skin. The treatment of GPP includes non-biologic and biologic therapies. In Japan, biologic agents are being increasingly used as first-line treatment, with more biologics approved in Japan than in other countries. A previous secondary data-based study utilizing data in the Medical Data Vision database and the Japan Medical Data Center in Japan demonstrated heterogeneity in real-world biologic treatment patterns, with at least one switch during the follow-up period (mean n switches 3.8; mean length of follow-up 3.3 years) for approximately one third of patients with GPP treated with a biologic drug. The aim of this study was to evaluate where consensus lies among experts regarding switching biologic treatments for patients with GPP in Japan.
Methods:
A Delphi exercise that consists of three survey rounds was performed with ten Japanese dermatologists. Participants were asked to respond to questions related to experts' experience with specific biologics, experience with switching, timing of switches and importance of specific criteria (drivers) when making the decision to switch. The consensus threshold was 70%.
Results:
Based on the results of the Delphi exercise, most experts rarely (60%) or never (20%) switch a biologic agent and only 20% switch often during acute symptoms/GPP flare driven by the short time of the flare; this result may be different during the maintenance phase. Lack of efficacy, loss of efficacy due to long-term use, side effects, contraindications, new products with better efficacy and safety evidence, risk of infection, and lack of adherence play an important role in making the decision to switch.
Conclusion:
Switches may occur for patients on biologics when flares occur (loss of effectiveness) or when there is insufficient response (lack of effectiveness). The decision to switch a biologic is impacted by several other criteria, including safety and the availability of more efficacious and better tolerated therapies. Overall, there is still an unmet need for robust evidence to inform GPP treatment choice.
More Related Videos
10:05Stimulation of Stem Cell Niches and Tissue Regeneration in Mouse Skin by Switchable Protoporphyrin IX-Dependent Photogeneration of Reactive Oxygen Species In Situ
Published on: May 8, 2020
02:28Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...