Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Accuracy of 177Lu activity quantification using MCNP5-Modeled SPECT imaging
P Morthy1, M Musarudin1, N S Ab Shukor1
1School of Health Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Abstract:
The present study was conducted to assess the accuracy of 177Lu quantification using Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5 MCNP5. The developed code was verified against calibration factor (CF) measured experimentally. The CF for converting SPECT data into units of activity concentration was determined by modeling two phantom configurations: (1) a uniform 177Lu concentration of 5.3600 ± 0.0005 MBq/mL in 20 mL Petri dish, resulting in a CF1 of 12.5 ± 1.5 cps/MBq, and (2) a 65.4 mL radioactive sphere (5.0 cm diameter) within a non-radioactive background in a cylindrical Jaszczak phantom, yielding a CF2 of 16.0 ± 2.0 cps/MBq. The significant difference between CF1 and CF2 (21.26 %) highlights the impact of phantom size and geometry on the calibration process. The quantification error was evaluated using recovery coefficient (RC) of the spherical inserts in a NEMA phantom. The established CFs and RCs provide a reliable framework for accurate activity quantification in 177Lu SPECT imaging using the established MCNP5 code. Our findings suggest that MCNP5 simulations can effectively model the SPECT imaging process, accounting for factors such as photon attenuation and scatter, offering the potential for improved dosimetry calculations in radionuclide therapy.
More Related Videos
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
08:08Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Quality Assurance