Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Electroacupuncture Combined with Chinese Medicine Ironing Therapy for Functional Constipation
Published on: July 5, 2024
Efficacy of anal botulinum toxin injection in children with functional constipation
Dhiren Patel1, Pavithra Saikumar1, Mayuri Jayaraman2
1Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, SSM Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Insights
Anal botulinum toxin (BTX) injections improved bowel movement frequency in children with functional constipation but had minimal impact on fecal incontinence. Parental and provider reports of improvement were significantly higher than observed outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Surgery
- Neuromuscular Medicine
Background:
- Functional constipation (FC) is a prevalent condition in children.
- While laxatives and behavioral therapies are standard, anal botulinum toxin (BTX) injections are explored for refractory FC.
- Limited data exists on BTX efficacy in pediatric FC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of anal BTX injections in treating pediatric functional constipation.
- To assess outcomes based on the presence or absence of fecal incontinence (FI).
- To compare observed treatment response with parental and provider reports.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, multicenter study of 63 pediatric patients with FC refractory to medical therapy.
- Patients received anal BTX injections and were categorized into three groups: FC with FI, FC without FI, and FI alone.
- Outcomes measured by improvement in bowel movement (BM) frequency and/or resolution of FI; parental/provider reports were also collected.
Main Results:
- 52% of patients achieved >3 BMs/week, and 17% showed improvement in FI.
- Response rates varied by group: 10% (FC with FI), 50% (FC without FI), 14% (FI alone).
- Parental/provider reports (70%) significantly overestimated observed improvement (21%). No association found with developmental delay.
Conclusions:
- Anal BTX injections can improve BM frequency in pediatric FC but have limited effect on FI.
- BTX efficacy is questionable in children with FC and developmental delay/behavioral disorders.
- A significant discrepancy exists between subjective parental/provider perception and objective treatment response.
Objectives:
Functional constipation (FC) is a common diagnosis in the pediatric age group. In addition to laxative regimens and behavioral interventions, some have reported the use of anal botulinum toxin (BTX) injections to treat FC, with limited data regarding its efficacy.
Methods:
This is a retrospective, multicenter study including patients who received BTX for FC refractory to medical therapy. Demographic data, results of anorectal manometry, and BTX data (number of sessions, dose, and side effects) were collected. Patients were divided into three groups based on the indication for BTX: group 1 (FC with FI [fecal incontinence]), group 2 (FC without FI), and group 3 (FI alone). Response to therapy was assessed for whole cohort and for each group based on improvement in weekly frequency of BM (bowel movements) to 3 or more per week and/or resolution of FI. We also compared the response to therapy to the parental and provider report.
Results:
A total of 63 patients were included in the study. Median age was 6.4 years and 32 (51%) were female. The median dose of BTX was 100 units, and most patients (55/63) received a single BTX injection. Medical therapy was continued after BTX injections in most patients (60/63 or 95%). After BTX, the frequency of BM increased to >3/week in 29/56 (52%) and FI improved in 8/47 (17%) for the whole cohort. We observed a response rate of 10% in group 1, 50% in group 2 and 14% in group 3. No factors (age, gender, anal resting pressure) were associated with BTX response except for prolonged time of therapy before BTX and shorter median follow up after BTX. Parents/primary provider reported improvement in 44/63 (70%) after BTX, which was significantly higher than the actual observed response to therapy (70% vs. 21%, p = 0.003, kappa = 0.202). We found no association between response to BTX and presence of developmental delay and/or behavioral disorders (p = 0.531). Side effects were minimal and noted in seven (11%) patients, mainly FI. No factors were associated with the development of side effects.
Conclusions:
Anal BTX injections improved BM frequency with minimal effect on FI with an overall symptom resolution in 21% of patients. BTX does not seem to have a notable effect in patients with FC and developmental delay and/or behavioral disorders. Provider and parental reported success were significantly higher than the actual observed response.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Bulk-Forming and Stimulant Laxatives
Bulk-forming laxatives, such as psyllium, methylcellulose, and polycarbophil, absorb water in the intestine, increasing stool bulk and promoting bowel movement. This...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Other Laxatives
Osmotic or saline laxatives, like magnesium hydroxide or milk of...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Opioids as Antidiarrheal Agents
Opioids, widely used antidiarrheal agents, mitigate diarrhea by slowing down...

