Pre-Treatment Serum Prognostic Scores and Survival in Curatively Treated Laryngeal Cancer
- Rhona Hurley 1,2,3,4, James Osbourne 5, Gareth J Inman 1,2,4, David I Conway 2,5, Claire Paterson 2,5,6, Catriona M Douglas 2,3,5
- Rhona Hurley 1,2,3,4, James Osbourne 5, Gareth J Inman 1,2,4
- 1School of Cancer Sciences, Garscube Estate, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
- 2Glasgow Head and Neck Cancer (GLAHNC) Research Group Glasgow UK.
- 3Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery - Glasgow Royal Infirmary and Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK.
- 4Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute Garscube Estate Glasgow UK.
- 5School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
- 6Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre Glasgow UK.
- 0School of Cancer Sciences, Garscube Estate, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Prognostic scores, including lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), help predict survival in laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC). Combining these scores with clinical factors improves outcome prediction for LSCC patients.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Head and Neck Cancer Research
- Biomarker Discovery
Background
- Laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) is a significant head and neck cancer.
- Despite decreasing incidence, LSCC survival rates have stagnated.
- Blood-based prognostic scores (NLR, PLR, LMR, SIII) show promise for predicting LSCC outcomes.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the association of prognostic scores with survival in LSCC patients.
- To determine if combining prognostic scores with clinicopathological variables enhances survival prediction.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 473 LSCC patients (2014-2020).
- Assessment of overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
- Categorization of patients into high- and low-risk groups based on combined prognostic scores.
Main Results
- Low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and high-risk scores correlated with poorer OS, CSS, and RFS.
- Nodal status and disease stage remain critical prognostic indicators.
- Integration of clinicopathological variables and prognostic scores improved survival prediction accuracy.
Conclusions
- Prognostic scores are valuable for predicting LSCC survival.
- Combined use of prognostic scores and clinicopathological factors may optimize patient management.
- Further research is needed to validate these findings.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
01:21
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
01:20
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

