AI-Derived Blood Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- He-Li Xu 1,2,3, Xiao-Ying Li 1,2,3, Ming-Qian Jia 1,2,3,4, Qi-Peng Ma 5, Ying-Hua Zhang 6, Fang-Hua Liu 1,2,3, Ying Qin 1,2,3,4, Yu-Han Chen 4,5, Yu Li 4,5, Xi-Yang Chen 1,2,3,4, Yi-Lin Xu 1,2,3, Dong-Run Li 1,2,3, Dong-Dong Wang 1,2,3,4, Dong-Hui Huang 1,2,3, Qian Xiao 1,5, Yu-Hong Zhao 1,2,3, Song Gao 5, Xue Qin 5, Tao Tao 5, Ting-Ting Gong 5, Qi-Jun Wu 1,2,3,4,5,7
- He-Li Xu 1,2,3, Xiao-Ying Li 1,2,3, Ming-Qian Jia 1,2,3,4
- 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
- 2Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
- 3Liaoning Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
- 4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
- 6Department of Undergraduate, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
- 7NHC Key Laboratory of Advanced Reproductive Medicine and Fertility (China Medical University), National Health Commission, ShenYang, China.
- 0Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, ShenYang, China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in diagnosing ovarian cancer (OC) using blood biomarkers, with high pooled sensitivity and specificity. Further research should focus on external validation and deep learning for improved diagnostic accuracy.
Area Of Science
- Biomarker Discovery
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Oncology Diagnostics
Background
- Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential for identifying noninvasive blood biomarkers.
- The diagnostic accuracy of AI-derived biomarkers for ovarian cancer (OC) requires further investigation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the research quality and diagnostic validity of AI-based blood biomarkers for ovarian cancer.
- To perform a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Main Methods
- Systematic literature search across multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library).
- Quality assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI tool.
- Meta-analysis of pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) using a bivariate model.
Main Results
- Included 40 studies, with most (78%) having a low risk of bias.
- Overall pooled diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity 85%, specificity 91%, AUC 0.95.
- Highest accuracy subgroup: sensitivity 95%, specificity 97%, AUC 0.99.
- Machine learning showed higher performance than deep learning; serum biomarkers outperformed plasma.
- External validation improved specificity but reduced sensitivity.
Conclusions
- AI algorithms demonstrate satisfactory performance for ovarian cancer diagnosis via blood biomarkers.
- AI holds potential as a future diagnostic tool, possibly reducing unnecessary surgeries.
- Future research should prioritize external validation and deep learning integration into AI diagnostic models.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

