Optimized outcome of the Ross procedure in children: single-centre experience

Peter Murin1, Julia Gaal1, Robin Stenzel1

  • 1Department of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Insights

Autograft reinforcement in the Ross procedure improved survival in children, with no significant difference in autograft reintervention rates. Homografts also showed better outcomes than xenografts for RV-PA reintervention.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric cardiac surgery
  • Aortic valve repair
  • Autograft reconstruction

Background:

  • The Ross procedure uses a patient's own pulmonary valve (autograft) to replace a diseased aortic valve.
  • Autograft failure can occur, especially during somatic growth in children.
  • Autograft reinforcement strategies aim to improve durability, but data in pediatric populations are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate long-term survival and reintervention rates after the Ross procedure in children.
  • To assess the impact of autograft reinforcement on outcomes in pediatric patients.
  • To identify factors influencing reintervention risk.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 233 pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent the Ross procedure between 1995 and 2022.
  • Patients were divided into groups based on whether autograft reinforcement (subcoronary implantation or external support) was used.
  • Kaplan-Meier survival and reintervention analyses were performed, with Cox regression identifying risk factors.

Main Results:

  • Autograft reinforcement was associated with significantly improved long-term survival (97.1% at 5/10 years vs. 87.0% without reinforcement).
  • No significant differences in autograft reintervention rates were observed between reinforced and non-reinforced groups.
  • Right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) reintervention-free survival was higher with homografts (96.9%) compared to xenografts (79.4%) at 5 years.

Conclusions:

  • The Ross procedure in children yields excellent long-term outcomes with low autograft reintervention rates.
  • Autograft reinforcement improves overall survival but does not significantly alter autograft-specific reintervention rates.
  • Further multicenter studies are needed to validate findings on reinforcement techniques and RV-PA outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos