Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: Medium-Term Results of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) for Obstructed Defecation
Expression Of Concern:
A.C. Goede, D. Glancy, H. Carter, A. Mills, K. Mabey, and A.R. Dixon, "Medium-Term Results of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) for Obstructed Defecation and Symptomatic Rectal-Anal Intussusception," Colorectal Disease 13, no. 9 (2011): 1052-1057, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02405.x. This Expression of Concern is for the above article, published online on 31 August 2010 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been issued by agreement between the journal Editors-in-Chief, Sue Clark and Neil Smart; The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Expression of Concern has been agreed due to concerns raised regarding the legitimacy of the data reported and allegations of a lack of informed consent from patients who underwent the surgical procedure reported within. The investigation into these concerns is ongoing. Therefore, the journal has decided to issue an Expression of Concern to inform and alert the readers.
Insights
An expression of concern has been issued for a study on Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) due to data legitimacy and informed consent issues. An investigation is currently ongoing.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Ethics
Background:
- The Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) procedure is used for obstructed defecation and rectal-anal intussusception.
- Concerns have been raised regarding the data and patient consent in a previously published study on STARR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To alert readers to an ongoing investigation into a published article concerning the STARR procedure.
- To highlight potential issues with data integrity and informed consent in the aforementioned study.
Main Methods:
- An Expression of Concern has been issued by the journal editors, The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and the publisher.
- The investigation involves examining the legitimacy of reported data and allegations of inadequate patient informed consent.
Main Results:
- The investigation into the reported data and patient consent for the STARR procedure is currently ongoing.
- The journal has issued an Expression of Concern to inform and alert readers of these developing issues.
Conclusions:
- The validity of the findings presented in the original article is currently under scrutiny.
- Further updates will be provided as the investigation progresses.
More Related Videos
09:40An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...