Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Frequency of Baseline Testing Influence Concussion Diagnostic Decision Making Among College Athletes.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2023
Same author

Performance of college athletes on the 10-item word list of SCAT5.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2018
Same journal

Anxiety in multiple sclerosis: an exploratory cross-sectional study of psychological, social, clinical, and neuroimaging factors.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Can Research Findings be Used in Clinical Neuropsychology? Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Working Memory Intervention for Children.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
Same journal

Safety-critical odor identification failure and cognitive performance in older U.S. adults: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
Same journal

Does performance invalidity undermine replication? Evidence from an undergraduate student participant sample.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
Same journal

The relationship between subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive assessment in severe mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
Same journal

Cognitive rehabilitation in contemporary neuropsychological practice: an exploratory survey of service delivery, reimbursement, and perceived barriers.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2025

A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes
11:32

A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes

Published on: December 8, 2014

12.7K

College Students' Normative and Sub-optimal Performance on Three Brief, Public Domain Performance-Validity Measures

Amber M Bankston1, Rima P Malkan1, Kaci K Garcia1

  • 1School of Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
|March 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Performance validity tests (PVTs) like the Dot Counting Test (DCT) and Auditory Vigilance Test (A-Test) effectively identify suboptimal performance. Combining multiple PVT failures enhances accuracy in detecting suspect effort.

Keywords:
AssessmentHead injuryMalingering/symptom validity testingNorms/normative studiesTraumatic brain injury

More Related Videos

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
10:31

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion

Published on: September 25, 2014

13.4K
Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
08:13

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2025

A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes
11:32

A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes

Published on: December 8, 2014

12.7K
A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
10:31

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion

Published on: September 25, 2014

13.4K
Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
08:13

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Performance Psychology

Background:

  • Performance validity tests (PVTs) are crucial for assessing the reliability of cognitive test data.
  • Existing PVTs vary in their ability to detect suboptimal performance across different cognitive domains.
  • Normative data for brief, public-domain PVTs are needed for diverse populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish normative data for three public-domain PVTs in non-athlete college students.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Rey's Word Recognition Test (WRT), Rey's Dot Counting Test (DCT), and A Random Letter Test of Auditory Vigilance (A-Test) in detecting suboptimal performance.
  • To compare performance between honest effort, simulated poor performance, and student-athlete groups.

Main Methods:

  • 154 non-athlete college students were randomly assigned to Honest-Effort, Fake-Bad, or Instructed Fake-Bad groups.
  • 50 student-athletes were recruited for comparison.
  • Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine cut scores for identifying suboptimal performance (SOP).

Main Results:

  • The DCT Combination Score and A-Test Omission Errors demonstrated significant differences between honest effort and SOP groups.
  • WRT measures showed significant differences but fell short of adequate predictive accuracy based on Area Under the Curve (AUC).
  • Student-athletes performed significantly differently from both SOP groups.

Conclusions:

  • The DCT Combination Score and A-Test Omission Errors are valid indicators of suboptimal performance.
  • Combining multiple PVT failures improves the identification of suspect performers while minimizing false positives.
  • The WRT measures require further investigation for their utility as standalone PVTs.