Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Predictors of neoplastic progression in gastroesophageal lesions indefinite for dysplasia
Valentina Angerilli1, Francesca Galuppini1, Stefano Brignola2
1Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Aims:
Current understanding of the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus with indefinite for dysplasia (BE-IND) and gastric indefinite for dysplasia (G-IND) remains limited. This study aims to identify prognostic histological and clinicopathological factors for IND progression in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Methods And Results:
Patients with confirmed BE-IND and G-IND, no previous evidence of dysplasia/cancer and follow-up of ≥ 6 months were included. The rate of neoplastic progression was calculated and the multivariate Cox regression model adjusted for demographic and histological features was used to identify risk factors for progression. A total of 719 patients diagnosed with IND (158 BE-IND and 561 G-IND) were identified, 395 of whom were excluded. Progression rates were 4.4 per 100 person-year for BE-IND and 1.6 per 100 person-year for G-IND patients. Progression was observed only in IND of hyperproliferative intestinal metaplasia (HIM) type. Operative link for gastritis assessment (OLGA) stage (III-IV versus 0-II) was the only significant predictor of G-IND progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 47.82, confidence interval (CI) = 5%: 6.24-366.37, P < 0.001]. In BE-IND patients, lack of interval endoscopy significantly increased the risk for BE-IND (HR = 13.45, CI = 95%: 1.24-145.75, P = 0.032).
Conclusion:
IND is a challenging diagnosis for pathologists and implies an increased risk for neoplasia, especially in BE patients, without providing definitive information for patient management. This study highlights that neoplastic progression of IND lesions is primarily associated with HIM type. For BE-IND, interval endoscopy significantly reduces progression risk, while in G-IND, OLGA staging (III-IV) is a strong predictor of progression. These findings emphasise the importance of identifying HIM and using OLGA staging in G-IND for better risk stratification and follow-up strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

