Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding
Published on: March 24, 2018
Halogen Bond-Driven Ligand Displacement: Co-Crystal Lattice Versus Coordination Bonds
Yury V Torubaev1, Omer Shaashua1, Savion Braunstein1
1Department of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.
Halogen bonds can displace amine ligands from copper and vanadyl complexes, despite generally being weaker than coordination bonds. This ligand displacement is amplified by crystal lattice stabilization, especially in Jahn-Teller distorted Cu(II) and vanadyl complexes.
Area of Science:
- Supramolecular Chemistry
- Coordination Chemistry
- Crystallography
Background:
- Coordination bonds typically exhibit greater strength than halogen bonds.
- Specific electronic configurations, like the Jahn-Teller effect in Cu(II) and trans influence in vanadyl complexes, can modulate M-N bond strengths.
- Halogen bonding (XB) involves interactions between electron-deficient regions of halogen atoms and electron-rich sites.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the competitive interactions between metal-ligand coordination bonds and halogen bonds.
- To explore the formation of co-crystals between transition metal acetylacetonate complexes and halogen bond donors.
- To understand the factors influencing ligand displacement in these systems.
Main Methods:
- Co-crystallization experiments using M(acac)2(L) complexes (M=Cu(II), V(IV)=O; L=amine) and 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene (1,4-DITFB).
- X-ray diffraction analysis to characterize the resulting crystalline structures.
- Computational studies to elucidate the energetic contributions to observed phenomena.
Main Results:
- Unexpected formation of separate M(acac)2·1,4-DITFB and L·1,4-DITFB co-crystals, instead of the anticipated M(acac)2(L)·1,4-DITFB adducts.
- Evidence of amine ligand displacement driven by halogen bonding.
- Computational analysis indicated that while halogen bonds alone might not break M-N bonds, lattice stabilization of halogen-bonded products facilitates displacement.
Conclusions:
- Halogen bonding, particularly when coupled with lattice stabilization, can overcome weaker coordination bonds in specific transition metal complexes.
- The Jahn-Teller distortion in Cu(II) and the trans influence in vanadyl complexes play a crucial role in enabling ligand displacement.
- This study highlights the nuanced interplay between coordination strength, halogen bonding, and crystal packing effects.
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Structural Isomerism
Isomers are different chemical species that have the same chemical formula. Structural isomerism of coordination compounds can be divided into two subcategories, the linkage isomers and coordination-sphere isomers.
Linkage isomers occur when the coordination compound contains a ligand that can bind to the transition metal center through two different atoms. For example, the CN− ligand can bind through the carbon atom or through the nitrogen atom. Similarly,...
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...

