Evaluation of the Effects of Photobiomodulation on Bone Density After Placing Dental Implants: A Pilot Study Using...

Background: One of the parameters of maximum interest regarding the quality of the intraoral hard tissues is represented by the bone density, with direct clinical implications. The evaluation of this extremely important clinical parameter can be achieved by several imaging methods, of which the most known in dentistry is represented by the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Objectives: The purpose of the study is to obtain a quantitative analysis of bone mineral density changes in patients who underwent treatments of photobiomodulation (PBM), as complementary to a surgical approach in oral surgery and implantology. Methods: The study included the retrospective analysis of maxillary cone beam computed tomography of 28 patients without pathology or medication known to affect bone metabolism or its qualitative and quantitative properties. All patients from the study group followed the same laser PBM treatment protocol after placing dental implants; the PBM protocol implied the intraoral use of a gallium aluminum arsenide laser (GaAlAs) of 808 nm, 450 mW, in pulsed mode, administering an energy of 6 J in 3 points corresponding to each inserted dental implant-mesial, distal, and apical-totaling 18 J/implant. Treatment sessions were performed immediately postoperatively and at a subsequent distance of 48 h for 2 weeks (a total of eight sessions). For every patient, bone density was analyzed before and after PBM treatment, in the same areas of interest, within the same anatomical landmarks. A comparison was also made between the results obtained for the anterior maxilla and the posterior maxilla. All the measurements made were analyzed statistically, the results being presented in the dedicated section. Results: Based on the data analysis, the comparison between the lasered and non-lasered groups reveals that patients who underwent PBM showed a statistically significant improvement in bone mineral density, with the mean increasing from 530.91 HU before treatment to 842.55 HU after treatment (t-test: p < 0.001). In contrast, the non-lasered group showed no significant improvement, with a slight decrease in bone mineral density, as the mean dropped from 495.19 HU before treatment to 462.16 HU after treatment (t-test: p = 0.47). Conclusions: The study demonstrated results with statistical significance regarding the mineral bone density improvement of patients who underwent laser PBM treatment. This positive effect of laser therapy has been shown, both at the level of the vestibular cortical bone and at level of the trabecular bone, independent of the patient's sex, for the anterior maxilla and at the lateral areas also.