Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

6.0K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
6.0K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

77.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
77.8K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.1K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.1K
The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness02:19

The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness

7.0K
The Y chromosome is a sex chromosome found in several vertebrates and mammals, including humans. In addition to 22 pairs of autosomes, the human males have one X chromosome and one Y chromosome. In these organisms, the presence or absence of the Y chromosome determines the development of male traits.
Evolution
Around 300 million years ago, the two sex chromosomes diverged from two identical autosomal chromosomes. Over time, the Y chromosome has lost most of its genes, shrinking in size....
7.0K
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

784
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
784
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

266
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
266

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Long? How Many? How Much? Evidence of Convergent Validity Among Thin-Slice Behavioral Coding Metrics.

Journal of nonverbal behavior·2026
Same author

What is Artificial Intelligence (AI) "Empathy"? A Study Comparing ChatGPT and Physician Responses on an Online Forum.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

Explicit Beliefs About Nonverbal Behavior and the Big Five Traits.

Journal of personality·2025
Same author

Personality Traits and Cognitive Abilities in Conflict Management: Preliminary Insights from a Situational Judgment Test of Emotional Intelligence.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

What Is Clinical Empathy in Anesthesiology? Perspectives From Practicing Anesthesiologists.

A&A practice·2025
Same author

Navigating social waters: exploring the impacts of trait cognitive emotion regulation and emotion recognition ability in naturalistic social situations.

The Journal of social psychology·2025
Same journal

Career Adaptability and Academic Achievement Among Chinese High School Students: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Social Cognitive and Metacognitive Mediating Mechanisms.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Preservice Science Teachers' Analogical Reasoning: Evidence from Analogy Design.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Instruction on Student Learning in STEM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Reading and Writing Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Adolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Emotional Intelligence, Self-Regulation, and Children's Well-Being in Fourth-Grade Students: Cross-Sectional Associations from Türkiye.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Detecting Demographic Influences on Measures of Spatial Ability with Rasch Tree Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K

Gender and Accuracy in Decoding Affect Cues: A Meta-Analysis.

Judith A Hall1, Sarah D Gunnery2, Katja Schlegel3,4

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Journal of Intelligence
|March 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Girls and women consistently show higher accuracy in emotion recognition than boys and men. This small but robust gender difference in understanding affect cues was observed across various factors, except for health status.

Keywords:
affectcuesdecodingemotion recognitiongender

More Related Videos

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.5K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

896

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.5K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

896

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Gender differences in emotion recognition have been studied for over a century.
  • Previous reviews indicate females generally outperform males in decoding affect cues from face, body, and voice.
  • This research provides an updated meta-analysis incorporating a larger dataset and broader scope.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To update the understanding of gender differences in emotion recognition accuracy.
  • To investigate the consistency of this gender difference across various moderators.
  • To identify factors that may influence or eliminate the observed gender gap.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted, synthesizing 1188 effect sizes from 1011 studies.
  • The total sample size included 837,637 participants.
  • Moderators examined included sample health status, international location, cue modalities, and other test characteristics.

Main Results:

  • A small but statistically significant gender difference favoring females in emotion recognition was confirmed (r = 0.12, d = 0.24).
  • This difference was highly consistent across numerous moderators, with minor variations.
  • Evidence for publication bias was minimal.
  • Only sample health status emerged as a moderator where significant gender differences were not observed.

Conclusions:

  • The findings confirm a persistent, albeit small, gender difference in emotion recognition, with females demonstrating higher accuracy.
  • The consistency of this effect across diverse conditions underscores its robustness.
  • Health status represents a key factor that may mitigate or eliminate gender disparities in affect cue understanding.