Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

06:57
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
11.3K
Developing a novel measure of non-rigid, ductile spatial skill
Grace Bennett-Pierre1, Thomas F Shipley2, Nora S Newcombe2
1CIRES Center for Education, Engagement, and Evaluation, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. grace.bennett-pierre@colorado.edu.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
|March 26, 2025
Summary
This study introduces a new measure for non-rigid spatial thinking, finding it correlates with other spatial skills and is influenced by gender and spatial activity engagement. Men outperformed women on knot reasoning tasks, with activity engagement mediating this difference.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- STEM Education
- Spatial Reasoning
Background:
- Non-rigid spatial thinking, involving dynamic transformations of objects, is crucial for STEM but understudied.
- Existing spatial skill measures often focus on rigid transformations, neglecting ductile ones.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel measure of non-rigid, ductile spatial skill using knot reasoning.
- To investigate the relationship between this new measure, existing spatial skills, and gender.
- To explore the influence of gendered spatial activities on non-rigid spatial performance.
Main Methods:
- Developed and administered a 54-item knot reasoning measure to 279 US adults.
- Correlated knot reasoning performance with established spatial skills measures in 147 US adults.
- Utilized structural equation modeling to examine mediation effects of gender and spatial activities.
Main Results:
- The knot reasoning measure demonstrated good reliability (α = .88) and correlated positively with existing spatial skills.
- Mental rotation and paper folding predicted knot reasoning performance.
- Men outperformed women on knot reasoning and paper folding; activity engagement mediated these differences.
- No significant differences in spatial skills were found across STEM and non-STEM majors.
Conclusions:
- Introduced a reliable measure for non-rigid, ductile spatial transformations.
- Provided evidence for the influence of gender and gendered spatial activities on non-rigid spatial skills.
- Highlighted the importance of considering non-rigid spatial abilities in STEM education and research.

