Related Experiment Videos
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation: criteria for a positive test
The American Journal of Cardiology
|July 1, 1985
Summary
Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) can predict future ventricular tachycardia (VT) or sudden cardiac death. Inducing 5 or more beats of VT during PVS testing is a more accurate predictor than inducing sustained VT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is used to assess risk in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT).
- There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal criteria for defining a positive PVS test.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively analyze PVS results in patients with documented VT.
- To determine the most accurate PVS criteria for predicting future cardiac events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of PVS results in 50 patients with documented sustained VT.
- Patients underwent PVS with single/double extrastimuli and burst pacing.
- Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was guided by PVS results and Holter monitoring.
Main Results:
- Induction of non-sustained or sustained VT during PVS was significantly associated with higher rates of sudden death or VT recurrence (p < 0.001).
- Defining a positive PVS test as the induction of 5 or more VT beats maximized predictive value and accuracy.
- This criterion showed significantly higher predictive accuracy compared to using only sustained VT.
Conclusions:
- PVS is a valuable tool for predicting adverse events in patients with VT.
- Using a threshold of 5 or more induced VT beats during PVS improves risk stratification.
- Optimized PVS criteria enhance the prediction of sudden cardiac death and VT recurrence.