Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
Published on: June 6, 2017
Comparison of Traditional and AI-Based Methods: Barrett Universal II vs. Ladas Super Formula in IOL Power Calculation
Ionela-Iasmina Yasar1, Servet Yasar2, Leila Al Barri1
1Ophthalmology Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Abstract:
Background: Pursuing optimal visual outcomes following cataract surgery remains a cornerstone of modern ophthalmology. Central to this objective is the precise calculation of intraocular lens power. However, despite significant advancements in biometric measurements and computational algorithms, variability in refractive outcomes continues to pose a challenge. This study aims to analyze the outcomes comprehensively by reviewing established and newer techniques. Methods: The eyes included in this study were evaluated based on various criteria, and a total of 210 eyes which met these criteria were included in the research. Our study is a retrospectively designed observational research study. The study included individuals who had experienced successful IOL implantation to correct refractive errors or cataracts. The ARGOS SS-OCT device, a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography system, was used in this study. In measuring the lens power, values were obtained using the Barrett Universal II and Ladas Super Formulas. These values were compared. Postoperative assessments were conducted at 1-3 months and 3-12 months, including spherical equivalents. Results: The mean age of the participants was 63.44 ± 11.62 years. The study's two most frequently used lens brands were ALCON and ZEISS. The lens powers calculated using the Barrett Universal II and Ladas Super Formulas were compared. The mean values calculated using both formulas were highly similar, with no statistically significant differences observed. We compared the spherical equivalent values calculated during the participants' first and second postoperative follow-ups. The spherical equivalent values were similar, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Formulas represent significant advances in ophthalmology and significantly improve visual outcomes; however, differences in their methodology and predictive accuracy warrant further analysis.
