Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Machine Learning Identification of Patient Phenoclusters in Aortic Regurgitation
Maan Malahfji1, Xin Tan2, Yodying Kaolawanich3
1Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background:
Current treatment paradigms assume aortic regurgitation (AR) patients to be a homogenous population, but varied courses of disease progression and outcomes are observed clinically.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to first use unsupervised machine learning to identify unique patient phenoclusters in AR, and subsequently evaluate their prognostic relevance.
Methods:
Clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characterization of moderate or severe AR patients was performed across 4 U.S.
Centers:
Data from 2 centers were used for derivation of phenoclusters and validation was performed in the other 2. The outcome was all-cause death. An unsupervised clustering pipeline, Partition Around Medoids, used 23 clinical and CMR variables to derive patient clusters independent of outcomes.
Results:
Included were 972 patients with mean age 62 ± 23.2 years, 754 (78%) male, 680 (70%) trileaflet valve, and 330 (34%) underwent valve surgery. Over a median follow-up of 2.58 years (Q1-Q3: 1.03-5.50 years), the overall mortality rate was 12%. Four clusters were derived: 1) a younger predominantly male phenotype with majority of bicuspid aortic valve and high extent of left ventricular (LV) remodeling (1% mortality); 2) older male patients with predominantly tricuspid valves and intermediate outcomes (10% mortality); 3) older predominantly male patients with the highest burden of comorbidities, LV scarring, and dysfunction (22% mortality); and 4) a phenotype of predominantly female patients with high mortality and relatively higher symptoms burden, relatively lower extent of LV remodeling, and rate of aortic valve replacement (20% mortality). The clustering algorithm was independently associated with survival after adjustment for time-dependent aortic valve replacement and traditional risk markers of prognosis in patients with AR (C statistic 0.77 vs 0.75; P = 0.009 in the validation cohort).
Conclusions:
Unique patient phenoclusters of AR are described using a machine learning approach leveraging comprehensive CMR and clinical characterization. This approach may be an opportunity for a precision medicine approach to enhance risk stratification of patients with AR. Female patients with AR pose a unique phenotype with high mortality, which deserves greater attention.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

