Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Items that are subject to retrieval-induced forgetting show slowed forgetting over time.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Prediction and prevention of ventilation impairments during bronchoscopy.

Intensive care medicine experimental·2025
Same author

Making guesses during learning can be beneficial for older adults' memory.

Psychology and aging·2025
Same author

Reinstating memories' temporal context at encoding causes Sisyphus-like memory rejuvenation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Interpolated pretesting can boost memory of related and distinct prose materials.

Psychological research·2024
Same author

The role of mediators for the pretesting effect.

Memory (Hove, England)·2024
Same journal

The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The length of a piece of string: Where the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on face identification and related perceptual processes: a systematic review.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Context-dependent motor-semantic interactions: evidence from dual-task paradigms in semantic fluency.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

A dual-process account of metaphorical embodiment.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.1K

The pretesting effect under divided attention.

Johannes Bartl1, Oliver Kliegl2, Karl-Heinz T Bäuml1

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.

Psychological Research
|March 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The pretesting effect, which enhances long-term memory, depends on attention during feedback. Distraction during initial testing is less harmful than distraction during feedback, impacting memory retention.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.1K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Pretesting prior to feedback can improve long-term retention compared to studying alone.
  • The role of attentional resources during pretesting and feedback stages is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the pretesting effect requires attentional resources during the initial pretest or subsequent feedback stages.
  • To determine how attentional demands during different phases of learning affect memory retention.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments used word-pair learning with either study-only or pretest trials.
  • Distraction (secondary task) was introduced during either the first or last 6 seconds of pretest trials.
  • Learning conditions varied between full attention and distraction to assess attentional resource demands.

Main Results:

  • The pretesting effect was observed in the absence of distraction.
  • Distraction during the initial pretest phase (first 6s) did not eliminate the pretesting effect.
  • Distraction during the feedback phase (last 6s) significantly eliminated the pretesting effect.
  • Recall impairments were greater when distraction occurred during the feedback stage compared to the initial testing stage.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional processes are critical for the pretesting effect, particularly during the feedback stage.
  • The findings support theoretical models emphasizing the importance of attention in memory consolidation.
  • Memory retention benefits from pretesting, but this benefit is contingent on sufficient attention during feedback.