Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Radioactive in situ Hybridization for Detecting Diverse Gene Expression Patterns in Tissue
Published on: April 27, 2012
Localized Tissue-Specific Gene Expression and Gene Duplications are Important Sources of Social Morph Differences in
Hongfei Xu1, Thomas J Colgan1,2
1Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Abstract:
Understanding the expression of multiple behaviorally and morphologically distinct phenotypes from a single genome represents a fundamental topic in evolutionary biology. Central to the complication of expressing phenotypes, which may differ in their optima, is the sharing of largely the same genome, which is predicted to manifest in conflict at the genomic level. This is particularly true for social insects where molecular mechanisms, such as differential gene expression, contribute to observed phenotypic differences between reproductive and nonreproductive morphs. In comparison, other mechanisms, such as tissue-specific expression and gene duplications, have been posited as contributing to social morph differences yet formal investigations are limited. Here, using a combination of transcriptomics for multiple tissues and comparative genomics, we show that in a social bumblebee, the strongest differences in gene expression are found in reproductive tissues, such as the spermatheca, an organ previously believed as vestigial in workers but recently shown as functional. In comparison, we find modest expression differences in genes between queens and workers for the brain, fat body, and ovary, which are traditionally investigated in social evolution. Interestingly, morph-biased genes in these three tissues display higher tissue-specificity suggesting that while social morphs may express a shared core transcriptome, localized expression profiles may contribute to phenotypic differences. We also find evidence of differential usage of duplicated genes by queens and workers, highlighting structural variants as a contributing factor to morph differences. Collectively, our findings highlight how social insects can utilize tissue-specific gene regulation and structural variants to contribute to phenotypic differences.
More Related Videos
10:57RNAi-mediated Double Gene Knockdown and Gustatory Perception Measurement in Honey Bees Apis mellifera
Published on: July 25, 2013
08:53Preparation of Single-cohort Colonies and Hormone Treatment of Worker Honeybees to Analyze Physiology Associated with Role and/or Endocrine System
Published on: September 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Gene Flow
Cell Specific Gene Expression
Cis-regulatory Sequences
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Gene Duplication and Divergence
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
General Transcription Factors