Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro
Published on: December 3, 2018
Role of physics-informed constraints in real-time estimation of 3D vascular fluid dynamics using multi-case neural
Wei Xuan Chan1, Wenhao Ding1, Binghuan Li2
1Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Numerical simulations of fluid dynamics in tube-like structures are important to biomedical research to model flow in blood vessels and airways. It is further useful to some clinical applications, such as predicting arterial fractional flow reserves, and assessing vascular flow wall shear stresses to predict atherosclerosis disease progression. Traditionally, they are conducted via computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, which, despite optimization, still take substantial time, limiting clinical adoption. To improve efficiency, we investigate the use of the multi-case Neural Network (NN) to enable real-time predictions of fluid dynamics (both steady and pulsatile flows) in a 3D curved tube (with a narrowing in the middle mimicking a stenosis) of any shape within a geometric range, using only geometric parameters and boundary conditions. We compare the unsupervised approach guided by physics governing equations (physics informed neural network or PINN) to the supervised approach of using mass CFD simulations to train the network (supervised network or SN). We find that multi-case PINN can generate accurate velocity, pressure and wall shear stress (WSS) results under steady flow (spatially maximum error < 2-5 %), but this requires a specific enhancement strategies: (1) estimating the curvilinear coordinate parameters via a secondary NN to use as inputs into PINN, (2) imposing no-slip wall boundary condition as a hard constraint, and (3) advanced strategy to better spatially propagate effects of boundary conditions. However, we cannot achieve reasonable accuracy for pulsatile flow with PINN. Conversely, SN provides very accurate velocity, pressure, and WSS predictions under both steady and pulsatile flow scenarios (spatially and/or temporally maximum error averaged over all geometries <1 %), and is much less computationally expensive to train. To achieve this, strategies (1) and (2) above and a spectral encoding strategy for pulsatile flow are necessary. Thus, interestingly, the use of physics constraints is not effective in our application.
Related Concept Videos
Accelerating Fluids
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
Navier–Stokes Equations
Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving
Applications of Integration to Find Blood Flow

