Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
Published on: July 17, 2012
Effects of a deep learning-based image quality enhancement method on a digital-BGO PET/CT system for 18F-FDG
Kenta Miwa1, Shin Yamagishi2, Shun Kamitaki2
1Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6 Sakaemachi, Fukushima-Shi, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan. kenta5710@gmail.com.
Background:
The digital-BGO PET/CT system, Omni Legend 32, incorporates modified block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) image reconstruction and a deep learning-based time-of-flight (TOF)-like image quality enhancement process called Precision DL (PDL). The present study aimed to define the fundamental characteristics of PDL using phantom and clinical images.
Methods:
A NEMA IEC body phantom was scanned using the Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system. All PET/CT images were acquired over 60 and 90 s per bed position, with a 384 × 384 matrix. Phantom images were reconstructed using OSEM + PSF and BSREM at β values of 100-1,000, combined with low (LPDL), medium (MPDL), and high (HPDL) PDL. We evaluated contrast recovery, background variability, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of a 10 mm hot sphere. Thirty clinical whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations were included. Clinical images were reconstructed using OSEM + PSF and BSREM at β values of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600, determined based on findings from the phantom study, combined with the three PDL models. Noise levels, mean SUV (SUVmean), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver as well as signal-to-background ratios (SBR) and maximum SUV (SUVmax) of lesions were evaluated. Two blinded readers evaluated visual image quality and rated several aspects to complement the analysis.
Results:
Contrast recovery and background variability decreased as the β value increased. This trend was consistent even when PDL processing was added to BSREM. Increased strength of the PDL models led to higher CNR. Noise levels decreased as a function of increasing β values in BSREM, resulting in a higher SNR, but lower SBR. Combining PDL with BSREM resulted in all β values producing better results in terms of noise, SBR, and SNR than OSEM + PSF. As the PDL increased (LPDL < MPDL < HPDL), noise levels, SBR, and SNR became higher. The β values of 400, 200, 300, and 300 for BSREM, LPDL, MPDL, and HPDL, respectively, resulted in noise equivalent to OSEM + PSF but significantly increased the SUVmax (9%, 15%, 18%, and 27%), SBR (16%, 17%, 20%, and 32%), and SNR (17%, 19%, 31%, and 36%), respectively. The visual evaluation of image quality yielded similar scores across BSREM + PDL reconstructions, although BSREM with β = 600 combined with MPDL delivered the best overall image quality and total mean score.
Conclusion:
The combination of BSREM and PDL significantly enhanced the SUVmax of lesions and image quality compared with OSEM + PSF. A combination of BSREM at β values of 500-600 and MPDL is recommended for oncological whole-body PET/CT imaging when using PDL on the Omni Legend.
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

