Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 Tesla
Published on: January 6, 2019
Comprehensive reference ranges for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: time to move on from single centre data?
John P Farrant1,2, Nicholas Black1,2, Kentaro Yamagata2
1Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
This study establishes comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) reference ranges for healthy adults, detailing measurement reproducibility and the impact of practice variations. Findings highlight the need for larger, diverse cohorts to define accurate normal ranges for CMR assessments.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is crucial for assessing cardiovascular structure, function, and tissue characteristics.
- Accurate, clearly defined normal ranges are fundamental for interpreting CMR measurements.
- Variations in CMR acquisition and analysis can impact measurement accuracy and reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine age- and sex-specific normal ranges for a wide array of CMR measurements in healthy adults.
- To assess the inter-scan reproducibility of these CMR measurements.
- To evaluate the influence of common variations in CMR practice on measurement outcomes.
Main Methods:
- 122 healthy adults underwent CMR (3T, Siemens), with 20 participants having repeat scans for reproducibility assessment.
- Image analysis was performed using cvi42 by experienced observers.
- Age- and sex-specific reference ranges were generated for parameters including ventricular volumes, mass, strains, atrial dimensions, and tissue characteristics (T1, T2, T2*).
Main Results:
- Comprehensive age- and sex-specific reference ranges and inter-scan reproducibility data are provided for numerous CMR parameters.
- Myocardial T1 measurement demonstrated the highest reproducibility among all assessed CMR parameters.
- Common variations in practice, such as slice selection and measurement planes, led to significant differences in results (e.g., indexed left atrial volume).
Conclusions:
- This study provides a valuable set of reference ranges and reproducibility data for common CMR measurements.
- Clinical practice variations can introduce significant variability, impacting the definition and application of normal ranges.
- Larger, multi-ethnic cohorts are recommended for establishing more robust and universally applicable CMR reference ranges.
More Related Videos
06:29Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI