Positioning Positionality and Reflecting on Reflexivity: Moving From Performance to Practice

Area of Science:

• Qualitative Research Methodology
• Research Ethics
• Academic Publishing

Background:

• Researcher reflexivity and positionality are crucial for assessing qualitative research quality.
• Current practices often equate positionality statements with identity disclosures as a proxy for reflexivity.
• This approach may not fully capture or benefit the reflexive process.

Purpose of the Study:

• To explore the relationship between reflexivity and positionality statements in qualitative research.
• To challenge the notion that identity-based positionality statements adequately represent reflexive practice.
• To examine the potential risks and limitations of 'shopping list' positionality statements.

Main Methods:

• Conceptual analysis of reflexivity and positionality in qualitative research.
• Examination of practices in peer review and editorial processes.
• Discussion of alternative methods for performing and communicating reflexivity.

Main Results:

• Positionality statements, particularly those focused on identity disclosure, are frequently used as a performative substitute for genuine reflexivity.
• 'Shopping list' approaches to positionality can pose risks, reinforce stereotypes, and homogenize marginalized researchers.
• Alternative methods for enacting and communicating reflexivity offer more nuanced and beneficial approaches.

Conclusions:

• Rethinking the role and communication of reflexivity in qualitative research is essential.
• Moving beyond superficial identity disclosures in positionality statements is necessary for robust research practice.
• Developing and implementing alternative reflexive practices can better serve researchers and the research process.