Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Quantification of abdominal aortic calcification using photon-counting CT angiography: an imaging biomarker for
Takashi Ota1, Atsushi Nakamoto2, Masatoshi Hori3
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, D1, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. t-ota@radiol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Objectives:
To evaluate abdominal aortic calcification parameters derived from 3D volumetric analysis using photon-counting CT (PCCT) angiography-based virtual non-calcium (VNCa) algorithm as an imaging biomarker for high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.
Methods:
This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal PCCT angiography and non-contrast-enhanced chest CT (nCE-CCT, including CT scanners other than PCCT) between March 2023 and June 2024. Abdominal aortic calcification maps were generated by subtracting VNCa from the corresponding CTA images to calculate the abdominal calcification volume (ACV) and aortic wall volume (AWV). Percentage calcification volume (PCV) was calculated as ACV/AWV. Agatston scores from nCE-CCT classified patients into low- (≤ 100) and high-risk (> 100) CVD groups. Correlations between Agatston score, ACV, and PCV were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the performance and cutoff values of ACV and PCV, with McNemar's test comparing sensitivities and specificities.
Results:
The study included 200 patients, 163 low- and 37 high-risk patients. Agatston score correlations with ACV and PCV were 0.75 and 0.78, respectively (p < 0.0001). PCV showed a superior AUC (0.94) than ACV (0.90, p = 0.0002). Cutoff values were 5.74 mL for ACV (75.7% sensitivity, 89.0% specificity) and 14.81% for PCV (73.0% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity), and PCV specificity was significantly higher than ACV specificity (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion:
PCV > 14.81% indicates an increased CVD risk, suggesting that PCV is a potential imaging biomarker for high-risk patients with CVD. Abdominal CTA alone may identify high-risk patients with CVD, warranting further cardiovascular screening.
More Related Videos
06:57Semi-Automatic Graphical Tool for Measuring Coronary Artery Spatially Weighted Calcium Score from Gated Cardiac Computed Tomography Images
Published on: September 22, 2023
08:02Novel Quantification Protocol for Cardiovascular Calcification Progression Using Longitudinal MicroPET/MicroCT Images
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies