Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
Published on: December 11, 2015
Accuracy of Smartphone-Mediated Snore Detection in a Simulated Real-World Setting: Algorithm Development and
Jeffrey Brown1, Zachary Mitchell1, Yu Albert Jiang1
1Bodymatter, Inc, 4343 Von Karman Ave, Suite 150J, Newport Beach, CA, 92660, United States, 1 877-870-0649.
Background:
High-quality sleep is essential for both physical and mental well-being. Insufficient or poor-quality sleep is linked to numerous health issues, including cardiometabolic diseases, mental health disorders, and increased mortality. Snoring-a prevalent condition-can disrupt sleep and is associated with disease states, including coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea.
Objective:
The SleepWatch smartphone app (Bodymatter, Inc) aims to monitor and improve sleep quality and has snore detection capabilities that were built through a machine-learning process trained on over 60,000 acoustic events. This study evaluated the accuracy of the SleepWatch snore detection algorithm in a simulated real-world setting.
Methods:
The snore detection algorithm was tested by using 36 simulated snoring audio files derived from 18 participants. Each file simulated a snoring index between 30 and 600 snores per hour. Additionally, 9 files with nonsnoring sounds were tested to evaluate the algorithm's capacity to avoid false positives. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each test, and results were compared by using Bland-Altman plots and Spearman correlation to assess the statistical association between detected and actual snores.
Results:
The SleepWatch algorithm showed an average sensitivity of 86.3% (SD 16.6%), an average specificity of 99.5% (SD 10.8%), and an average accuracy of 95.2% (SD 5.6%) across the snoring tests. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 98.9% (SD 2.6%) and 93.8% (SD 14.4%) respectively. The algorithm performed exceptionally well in avoiding false positives, with a specificity of 97.1% (SD 3.5%) for nonsnoring files. Inclusive of all snoring and nonsnore tests, the aggregated accuracy for all trials in this bench study was 95.6% (SD 5.3%). The Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean bias of -29.8 (SD 41.7) snores per hour, and the Spearman correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (rs=0.974; P<.001) between detected and actual snore rates.
Conclusions:
The SleepWatch snore detection algorithm demonstrates high accuracy and compares favorably with other snore detection apps. Aside from its broader use in sleep monitoring, SleepWatch demonstrates potential as a tool for identifying individuals at risk for sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea, on the basis of the snoring index.
