Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in the Piglet
Published on: November 4, 2015
Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV in Brazilian PICUs: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Gustavo Rodrigues-Santos1,2, Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa2,3, Fernanda Lima-Setta2,4
1Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Insights
The Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) IV score demonstrated good discrimination but poor calibration in Brazilian pediatric intensive care units. Further research is needed to improve its performance in diverse healthcare settings.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Health services research
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) IV score is a widely used tool for predicting mortality in critically ill children.
- Evaluating the performance of PRISM IV in diverse healthcare systems, such as Brazil's, is crucial for its effective application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of the PRISM IV score in a large cohort of patients admitted to Brazilian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
- To evaluate the score's discrimination and calibration using the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and calibration belt technique.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study involving 36 Brazilian PICUs.
- Inclusion of 12,046 children aged 29 days to 18 years admitted between March 2020 and March 2022.
- Performance assessment using SMR, AUROC (95% CI), and calibration belt (80% and 95% CI).
Main Results:
- Overall observed mortality (2.1%) was higher than predicted (1.56%), with an SMR of 1.32.
- Good discrimination was observed (AUROC = 0.86), but calibration was poor, underestimating mortality across a wide range (2-61%).
- Performance varied during the COVID-19 pandemic, with poorer calibration in the prevaccine period and improved, though still imperfect, calibration in the postvaccine period.
Conclusions:
- PRISM IV exhibits good discriminative ability but significant miscalibration in Brazilian PICUs.
- The score's performance is affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitating adjustments for different temporal phases.
- Further research, including subgroup analyses, is essential to enhance PRISM IV's accuracy within Brazil's heterogeneous healthcare contexts.
Importance:
This is the first Brazilian study evaluating the performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) IV and the first to use the calibration belt technique.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PRISM IV in a large cohort of patients admitted to Brazilian PICUs.
Design, Setting And Participants:
This is a longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study conducted in 36 Brazilian PICUs with children between 29 days and 18 years old admitted from March 2020 to March 2022.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
PRISM IV's performance was assessed using the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% CI, and the calibration belt with 80% and 95% CI.
Results:
A total of 12,046 patients from 36 PICUs were included. Observed overall in-hospital mortality was higher than predicted: observed = 249 (2.1%) × predicted = 188.1 (1.56%) (SMR = 1.32 [95% CI, 1.16-1.50]); discrimination was good (AUROC = 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89]), and calibration was poor, underestimating mortality over a wide range of predicted mortality (2-61%). To explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PRISM IV's performance, we divided the study period into prevaccine and postvaccine. In the prevaccine period, the SMR was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.17-1.62), the AUROC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), and the range of miscalibration was broader than in the total cohort (underestimation in the 2-98% range). In the postvaccine period, the SMR was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.03-1.51), the AUROC was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.94), and the calibration belt underestimated mortality in a narrower range of 3-46% of predicted mortality.
Conclusions And Relevance:
PRISM IV showed good discrimination but miscalibration across a wide range of predicted mortality and different COVID-19 pandemic periods in a large cohort. Further research with subgroup analyses are needed to develop strategies to improve the performance of PRISM IV in different and heterogeneous Brazilian healthcare contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

