Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Live Imaging Assay for Assessing the Roles of Ca2+ and Sphingomyelinase in the Repair of Pore-forming Toxin Wounds
Published on: August 25, 2013
Identifying cardiovascular toxicity associated with sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators: A case-control study
Ying Li1, Jingmin Zhang1, Guangrui Yang2
1Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, PR China.
Introduction:
Cardiovascular events represent a significant safety concern associated with sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators. However, as S1PR modulators are primarily indicated for rare diseases characterized by multiple complex confounding factors, evidence regarding potential or long-term cardiovascular risks related to these drugs remains limited. This study aimed to comprehensively assess cardiovascular safety signals associated with S1PR modulators.
Methods:
This case-control study was conducted based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. The dataset included reports from September 10, 2010 to September 30, 2023. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) were calculated by logistic regression in four different models to examine the robustness of the results. Additionally, to assess adverse event profiles based on clinical trial data, a systematic literature review and subsequent data synthesis were conducted.
Results:
We included 81,077 cases treated with S1PR modulators (median [IQR] age, 45 [36-54]; 60,245 [74.31 %] female), and 12,087,627 cases with no prior use of S1PR modulators as comparators. Besides signals of hypertension and bradyarrhythmias, QT interval prolongation in the fingolimod group (ROR = 1.92 [95 % CI, 1.73-2.12]; P < 0.001), and central nervous system ischemia in the siponimod group (ROR = 1.26 [95 % CI, 1.04-1.52]; P = 0.02) were also detected in all models. Signals of tachyarrhythmias and ischaemic heart disease in the fingolimod group as well as QT interval prolongation in the siponimod group were consistent in all adjusted models.
Conclusion:
In this study, signals of bradyarrhythmias, hypertension, QT interval prolongation, central nervous system ischemia, tachyarrhythmias, and ischaemic heart disease were significant with one or more S1PR modulators, which warrant clinical attention and ongoing monitoring.
More Related Videos
10:01High-Throughput Optical Controlling and Recording Calcium Signal in iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Toxicity Testing and Phenotypic Drug Screening
Published on: March 31, 2022
12:27A Pipeline to Investigate the Structures and Signaling Pathways of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptors
Published on: June 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions