Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting quality of life of patients after treatment for spinal metastatic disease: development and internal

Rene Harmen Kuijten1, Bas Bindels1, Olivier Groot1

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society
|March 28, 2025
PubMed

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends in radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases: a multi-center study of practice patterns before, during, and after COVID-19.

Radiation oncology journal·2026
Same author

Perspectives on artificial intelligence-generated chronic disease risk predictions in early breast cancer: an international survey among radiation oncologists.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
Same author

Effect of yoga on musculoskeletal complaints in women during endocrine treatment for breast cancer: protocol of the randomised controlled COBRA trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Timely Integration of specialist palliative care into oncology care for patients receiving radiotherapy for bone metastases: A study procotol for the TIPZO-RT Randomized Controlled Trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Learning from every patient: the 'outpatient innovation clinic'.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Prevalence and Associated Factors in COVID-19-Unvaccinated Children: A Cross-sectional Study.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·2026
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new random forest model predicts quality of life (QoL) improvements in patients with spinal metastases. This tool aids clinicians in tailoring palliative care for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Palliative Care
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Quality of Life (QoL) is paramount in palliative care for spinal metastases.
  • Current treatment strategies balance QoL with survival, but lack predictive models for QoL outcomes.
  • No existing model predicts QoL post-treatment for spinal metastases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and internally evaluate a machine learning model for predicting QoL in patients with spinal metastases.
  • The model aims to cover diverse local treatment modalities.
  • To provide clinicians with a tool to better estimate QoL benefits.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study involving 953 patients with spinal metastases.
  • Development of five machine learning models (random forest, gradient boosting, SVM, penalized logistic regression, neural network).
Keywords:
Bone metastasesDevelopmentInternal evaluationMachine learningPrediction modelQuality of lifeSpinal metastasis

Related Experiment Videos

  • Internal evaluation using cross-validation and bootstrapping, assessing discrimination (AUC) and calibration.

    • Main Results:

    • The random forest model demonstrated superior calibration and was selected (AUC 0.78).
    • Key predictors included baseline QoL, Karnofsky Performance Scale, tumor histology, opioid use, and brain metastases.
    • 32% of patients achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in QoL at 3 months.

    Conclusions:

    • An internally validated random forest model can predict meaningful QoL improvement 3 months post-treatment for spinal metastases.
    • The model can assist in clinical decision-making for palliative care.
    • External validation is recommended to confirm generalizability in clinical practice.