Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional reorganization of motor cortex connectivity during learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Movie reconstruction from mouse visual cortex activity.

eLife·2026
Same author

Behavioral Timescale Synaptic Plasticity: A Burst in the Field of Learning and Memory.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Cortical glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs support learning-driven hippocampal stability.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Self-supervised predictive learning accounts for cortical layer-specificity.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Differential modulation of positive and negative prediction errors by stimulus variability in the mouse posterior parietal cortex.

Communications biology·2025
Same journal

Kat5 deficiency in alveolar type II cells licenses STAT6-driven glycolytic reprogramming and pulmonary fibrosis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Continuous nonthermal slab gap formed by progressive tearing beneath Northeast Asia.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Zeolitic isolated protonic acid sites-mediated NH<sub>3</sub> storage for robust NO<sub>x</sub> removal.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Coaxially nested component with asymmetric fiber resonant cavity and separation membrane for gaseous and dissolved gases detection.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Near-unity charge readout signal in a nonlinear resonator without matching the sensor dissipation.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Prokaryotic Schlafen proteins cleave tRNAs during type III CRISPR immunity.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
06:45

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Published on: October 28, 2022

Uncertainty estimation with prediction-error circuits.

Loreen Hertäg1, Katharina A Wilmes2, Claudia Clopath3

  • 1Modeling of Cognitive Processes, TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany. loreen.hertaeg@tu-berlin.de.

Nature Communications
|March 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain estimates sensory and prediction uncertainty using a hierarchical prediction-error network. This network adjusts reliance on sensory input versus predictions based on noise and environmental stability, influencing perception.

More Related Videos

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
06:45

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Published on: October 28, 2022

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Perception

Background:

  • Neural circuits integrate sensory data with predictions, often facing conflicting inputs.
  • Accurate integration requires estimating the uncertainty of both sensory stimuli and internal predictions.
  • The mechanisms by which the brain tracks these uncertainties remain largely unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate how neural circuits estimate sensory and prediction uncertainty.
  • To investigate the role of prediction-error neurons in uncertainty processing.
  • To link uncertainty estimation to perceptual biases.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a hierarchical prediction-error network model.
  • Simulation of neural responses to noisy sensory stimuli and predictions.
  • Perturbation of inhibitory interneurons within the model to assess their function.
  • Analysis of model output to identify contributions to perceptual biases.

Main Results:

  • A hierarchical prediction-error network can successfully estimate both sensory and prediction uncertainty.
  • Positive and negative prediction-error neurons play distinct roles in this estimation.
  • The model demonstrates that circuits rely more on predictions during noisy sensory input and stable environments.
  • Inhibitory interneuron perturbation reveals their critical role in uncertainty processing and input weighting.
  • Model simulations link stimulus and prediction uncertainty to the observed contraction bias in perception.

Conclusions:

  • Hierarchical prediction-error networks provide a viable mechanism for estimating neural uncertainty.
  • Uncertainty estimation is crucial for dynamically weighting sensory and predictive information.
  • The findings offer insights into the neural basis of perceptual biases, specifically contraction bias.