Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Proton dose calculation with transformer: Transforming spot map to dose
Xueyan Tang1, Hok Wan Chan Tseung1, Mark D Pepin1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Background:
Conventional proton dose calculation methods are either time- and resource-intensive, like Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, or they sacrifice accuracy, as seen with analytical methods. This trade-off between computational efficiency and accuracy highlights the need for improved dose calculation approaches in clinical settings.
Purpose:
This study aims to develop a deep-learning-based model that calculates dose-to-water (DW) and dose-to-medium (DM) using patient anatomy and proton spot map (PSM), achieving approaching MC-level accuracy with significantly reduced computation time. Additionally, the study seeks to generalize the model to different treatment sites using transfer learning.
Methods:
A SwinUNetr model was developed using 259 four-field prostate proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans to calculate patient-specific DW and DM distributions from CT and projected PSM (PPSM). The PPSM was created by projecting PSM into the CT scans using spot coordinates, stopping power ratio, beam divergence, and water-equivalent thickness. Fine-tuning was then performed for the central nervous system (CNS) site using 84 CNS plans. The model's accuracy was evaluated against MC simulation benchmarks using mean absolute error (MAE), gamma analysis (2% local dose difference, 2-mm distance-to-agreement, 10% low dose threshold), and relevant clinical indices on the test dataset.
Results:
The trained model achieved a single-field dose calculation time of 0.07 s on a Nvidia-A100 GPU, over 100 times faster than MC simulators. For the prostate site, the best-performing model showed an average MAE of 0.26 ± 0.17 Gy and a gamma index of 92.2% ± 3.1% in dose regions above 10% of the maximum dose for DW calculations, and an MAE of 0.30 ± 0.19 Gy with a gamma index of 89.7% ± 3.9% for DM calculations. After transfer learning for CNS plans, the model achieved an MAE of 0.49 ± 0.24 Gy and a gamma index of 90.1% ± 2.7% for DW computations, and an MAE of 0.47 ± 0.25 Gy with a gamma index of 85.4% ± 7.1% for DM computations.
Conclusions:
The SwinUNetr model provides an efficient and accurate method for computing dose distributions in proton therapy. It also opens the possibility of reverse-engineering PSM from DW, potentially speeding up treatment planning while maintaining accuracy.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Transmutation
Biological Effects of Radiation
Transformers
The iron core has a substantial relative permeability. Therefore, the magnetic field lines generated due to the current in one winding are almost entirely confined within the core, such that the same magnetic flux permeates each turn of both...
Reducing Line Loss
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss in...
Transformers with Off-Nominal Turns Ratios