Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025

Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology
Published on: December 15, 2017
Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?
Achim Langenbucher1, Nóra Szentmáry2,3, Jascha Wendelstein1,4
1Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Purpose:
To design a vergence-based lens power formula based on the classical Haigis formula for better outcomes while retaining the original formula architecture.
Methods:
Four new formula variants (A-D) incorporating a sum of segments correction for axial length, harmonic mean of corneal radii instead of arithmetic mean (all variants), and differing combinations of lower keratometer index (C, D) and an additional term (a3) representing the lens thickness in the effective lens position (B, D) were assessed in an analysis based on four datasets of IOLMaster 700 biometric data for eyes treated with the Hoya Vivinex lens (dataset 1), Alcon SA60AT lens (2), Johnson & Johnson ZCB00 lens (3), and the Bausch & Lomb MX60 lens (4). All parameters (formula constants and keratometer index) were calculated by nonlinear iterative optimisation techniques for minimising the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE). Performance was assessed in terms of the final RMSPE.
Results:
All four variants showed reductions in RMSPE ranging from 2.8% to 12.6% over the original Haigis formula. For each of the four datasets, variants B and D (with the additional a3 constant) performed better in this respect than variants A and C. In all four cases, variants C and D (with the adjusted keratometer index) performed slightly better than A and B, respectively.
Conclusion:
Although not amenable to statistical analysis, the % improvements in RMSPE would appear to be clinically relevant. However, the benefit has to be proven in a prospective multicentric study with a large sample size.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

