Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
A Novel Procedure for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Tastants in Laboratory Rats: Operant Intraoral Self-administration
Published on: February 6, 2014
The non-cariogenic effects of aspartame: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Stephen A Fleming1, Rachel A F Fleming1, Jennifer Peregoy1
1Traverse Science, Inc., Mundelein IL, 60060 USA.
Objectives:
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the cariogenicity of aspartame and explored mechanisms of action.
Data, Sources, And Study Selection:
A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL on February 16th, 2024 (registered with PROSPERO CRD42024513463). Eligible studies evaluated the cariogenicity of aspartame in humans, animals, and dental samples compared to sucrose or other controls. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on caries incidence, acidogenicity, oral bacterial composition, and mineralization for preclinical and clinical trials. Certainty was assessed using the GRADE framework.
Conclusion:
Four studies in bovine blocks, seven preclinical trials in rats, and two clinical studies were identified. In clinical studies aspartame was less acidogenic than sucrose (standardized mean difference [95 % confidence interval]: 3.07 [-0.97, 7.10], very low certainty), and similar to water (-0.51 [-1.51, 0.48], low certainty). Preclinical studies indicated aspartame did not promote caries development (-0.01 [-0.31, 0.30], low certainty), reduced caries compared to sucrose (-2.51 [-3.50, -1.52], moderate certainty), but had minimal impact when added to sucrose (-0.53 [-1.29, 0.23], very low certainty), except when assessed in sulcal caries (-0.86 [-1.70, -0.02]). Aspartame had minimal effect on bacterial composition. Studies on bovine blocks indicated aspartame was less acidogenic and erosive than sucrose. While aspartame is a non-cariogenic alternative to sucrose, there is limited evidence supporting anti-cariogenicity. The reduction in caries observed with aspartame use is likely due to its role in minimizing sugar intake rather than biological activity. More long-term studies in humans are needed to fully assess aspartame's impact on oral health.
Clinical Significance:
Replacement of sugar with aspartame may help maintain healthy oral pH in humans. Animals fed aspartame instead of sugar consistently develop fewer caries, and lab tests indicate aspartame lessens oral acids and dental erosion compared to sugar.
More Related Videos
08:07Simultaneous Detection of c-Fos Activation from Mesolimbic and Mesocortical Dopamine Reward Sites Following Naive Sugar and Fat Ingestion in Rats
Published on: August 24, 2016
08:20Systematic Approach to Identify Novel Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Molecules from Plants' Extracts and Fractions to Prevent Dental Caries
Published on: March 31, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:36Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...
01:26Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
01:25Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
01:12Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
01:19Overview of Carbohydrate Metabolism
Glucose transport into cells is facilitated by a family of transport proteins called GLUT (Glucose Transporters). GLUT4 is the primary glucose transporter for insulin-stimulated glucose...