Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Using a Pan-Viral Microarray Assay Virochip to Screen Clinical Samples for Viral Pathogens
Published on: April 27, 2011
Clinical and cost implications of Biofire FilmArray® meningitis / encephalitis panel testing: a systematic review
Nastaran Rafiei1, Shradha Subedi2, Patrick Na Harris3
1Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia; Caboolture Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Background:
Meningitis and encephalitis are diseases with high case fatality rates and serious long-term sequalae. A significant percentage do not receive an aetiological diagnosis, in part due to limitations of conventional testing methods. The Biofire FilmArray® Meningitis / Encephalitis Panel (MEP) is the first commercially approved multiplex PCR panel for diagnosis of infectious meningoencephalitis. It provides rapid results and has the potential to reduce empiric antimicrobial use and length of hospitalisation when compared to conventional testing.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of MEP implementation by searching the Medline and Embase databases. The outcomes of interest were duration of acyclovir treatment, duration of antimicrobials, length of stay and healthcare cost.
Results:
A total of 23 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, the majority of which were retrospective studies comparing cohorts before and after MEP implementation. The included studies were very heterogenous, with variation in MEP implementation strategies, standard of care diagnostics and study populations. MEP testing resulted in reduction in acyclovir use in 75 % of studies with an average reduction of 39 h (range 11-144 h). Antimicrobial use and length of stay was reduced in 44 % and 40 % of studies respectively. Five studies looked at healthcare costs, variably described between studies as hospitalisation, antimicrobial and microbiology costs. Total hospitalisation cost was reduced in 1 study and unchanged in 2 studies.
Conclusion:
Whilst MEP implementation reduces acyclovir usage in patients evaluated for ME, the benefits in terms of antibiotic use, and length of stay are variable and likely depend on the study population, implementation strategy and standard of care testing available in each institution.
Insights
The Biofire FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (MEP) reduces acyclovir use for infectious meningoencephalitis. However, its impact on antibiotic use and hospital stay varies by institution and patient population.
Area of Science:
- Clinical microbiology
- Infectious diseases
- Diagnostic technology
Background:
- Meningitis and encephalitis have high mortality and sequelae rates, often lacking etiological diagnosis due to conventional testing limitations.
- The Biofire FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (MEP) is a multiplex PCR diagnostic tool for infectious meningoencephalitis, offering rapid results.
- MEP has the potential to decrease empiric antimicrobial use and shorten hospital stays compared to traditional methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the impact of implementing the MEP on patient outcomes.
- To evaluate changes in acyclovir treatment duration, antimicrobial use, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs post-MEP implementation.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of Medline and Embase databases.
- Inclusion of 23 studies, primarily retrospective, comparing pre- and post-MEP implementation cohorts.
- Outcomes assessed included duration of acyclovir and antimicrobial treatment, length of stay, and healthcare costs.
Main Results:
- MEP implementation reduced acyclovir use in 75% of studies (average 39 hours).
- Reductions in antimicrobial use and length of stay were observed in 44% and 40% of studies, respectively.
- Healthcare cost analysis was variable; one study showed reduced total hospitalization costs, while two showed no change.
Conclusions:
- MEP implementation effectively reduces acyclovir usage in patients evaluated for meningitis/encephalitis.
- The benefits of MEP on antibiotic use and length of stay are inconsistent.
- Variability in outcomes likely depends on patient population, implementation strategy, and available standard diagnostic tests.
More Related Videos
07:40Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Viral Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Encephalitis l: Introduction
Encephalitis ll: Pathophysiology