Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Early Viral Entry Assays for the Identification and Evaluation of Antiviral Compounds
Published on: October 29, 2015
Testing-isolation interventions will likely be insufficient to contain future novel disease outbreaks
Jeffery Demers1, William F Fagan2, Sriya Potluri3
1Center for Advanced Systems Understanding (CASUS), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rosendorf (HZDR), Görlitz, Germany; Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Testing and isolation strategies often fail to contain novel pathogen outbreaks due to resource limits. Disease traits like transmission rate and asymptomatic spread significantly impact epidemic control success.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Mathematical Modeling
- Public Health
Background:
- Rapid diagnostic testing and isolation are crucial for controlling novel pathogen outbreaks.
- The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted challenges in meeting testing demands, potentially hindering epidemic containment.
- Understanding how disease characteristics influence the effectiveness of testing-isolation strategies under resource constraints is critical for future pandemic preparedness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the generalizability of testing-isolation strategy failures across various novel human pathogens.
- To identify key disease characteristics that determine epidemic controllability under realistic testing capacity limitations.
- To provide guidelines for managing expectations and optimizing control strategies for future disease invasions.
Main Methods:
- Development and application of a generalized mathematical model.
- Parameterization of the model using data from seven distinct human diseases and their variants.
- Analysis of disease controllability based on factors including basic reproduction number, latent period, and non-symptomatic transmission.
Main Results:
- Testing-isolation strategies are generally insufficient to contain epidemic outbreaks at achievable testing capacities.
- The basic reproduction number, mean latent period, and non-symptomatic transmission index were identified as key determinants of controllability.
- Disease characteristics significantly influence the effectiveness of testing-isolation and the need for additional measures.
Conclusions:
- Epidemic control via testing-isolation alone is often infeasible for novel pathogens with high transmission potential or significant asymptomatic spread.
- Diseases with specific trait combinations require supplementary transmission-reduction measures, such as social distancing, for effective containment.
- This research offers a framework for anticipating and managing controllability challenges posed by future novel disease outbreaks.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

