Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Real-time Pressure-volume Analysis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Mice
Published on: July 2, 2018
Difference in Strategy and Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Disease in Japan and Non-Japanese Countries
Takayuki Warisawa1,2,3, Christopher M Cook4,5, Yousif Ahmad6
1Department of Cardiology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo.
Insights
Japanese patients with left main disease (LMD) experienced significantly lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after contemporary treatment. This study highlights improved cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese individuals undergoing advanced LMD therapies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- State-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) improves cardiovascular outcomes.
- Comparative outcomes between Japanese and non-Japanese patients receiving contemporary LMD treatment are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese and non-Japanese patients with LMD undergoing contemporary treatment.
- To identify potential differences in strategy and outcomes based on ethnicity in LMD management.
Main Methods:
- International multicenter registry analysis of 314 patients with LMD.
- Patients received state-of-the-art management: physiology-guided revascularization, drug-eluting stents with intracoronary imaging, or CABG with internal thoracic artery grafts.
- Propensity score matching was used to compare Japanese (n=122) and non-Japanese (n=192) cohorts, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as the primary endpoint.
Main Results:
- Japanese patients had higher rates of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX scores, and more severe stenosis, leading to more frequent revascularization.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention was the preferred revascularization strategy in the Japanese cohort.
- After propensity score matching, the Japanese cohort showed significantly lower 4-year MACE (6.3% vs. 16.7%; HR: 0.37; P=0.042), confirmed by multivariate analysis (HR: 0.37; P=0.040).
Conclusions:
- Contemporary treatment for left main disease in Japan is associated with significantly better cardiovascular outcomes.
- Japanese patients demonstrated a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 4 years compared to non-Japanese patients.
- Further research into the factors contributing to these ethnic outcome disparities in LMD management is warranted.
Abstract:
Although state-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) has been demonstrated to improve overall cardiovascular outcomes, it remains unclear whether differences in strategy and outcomes for Japanese and non-Japanese patients can be observed in a contemporary treatment.In this international multicenter registry, we analyzed 314 patients who received state-of-the-art management for LMD, including physiology-guided revascularization, coronary interventions using the latest drug-eluting stents aided by intracoronary imaging, or surgical procedures employing internal thoracic artery grafts, in conjunction with guideline-directed medical therapy. The patient cohort was divided into Japanese (n = 122) and non-Japanese (n = 192) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for baseline clinical variables.Baseline and lesion characteristics differed among groups, demonstrating higher frequency of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX score, and more severe stenosis in the Japanese cohort, resulting in a higher rate of revascularization performed (P < 0.05 for all). Percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly more frequently selected as the revascularization option (P < 0.001). While there were no significant differences in MACE between the 2 groups before adjustment, following adjustment, the Japanese cohort demonstrated significantly lower MACE at 4 years (6.3% versus 16.7%; HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.97; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis further confirmed an independent association between Japanese patients and a reduced 4-year MACE risk (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.040).In a contemporary study with state-of-the-art therapy for LMD, patients who underwent treatment in Japan demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

